Submitted by Rubysdad1975 t3_z5dhaw in baltimore
fakeguru2000 t1_iy0jouq wrote
Reply to comment by Renaiconna in Five houses targeted for demolition in Mount Vernon historic district by Rubysdad1975
The confusion is there because you took my comment as disagreement when I agree that the church has an obligation to the community around it vs the commenter who posted this church has no obligation to the community. Apologies for the confusion. I listed the scripture to show that the church has a responsibility to the community around it. Not legally but ethically and definitely binding by Christ command.
Renaiconna t1_iy0m6a2 wrote
Ah! Understood now, thank you for clarifying. There are a lot of misconceptions flying around elsewhere in this comment section, so I was already feeling a little defensive, but it is definitely still my fault for presuming negative intentions; please forgive me.
fakeguru2000 t1_iy0ngv5 wrote
I understand. Don’t be defensive though. Many people are misinformed but become aware through your grounded debate. When dealing with Christian matters I add evidence text so people can’t refute especially since the Bible is the foundation of Christianity. I don’t get into doctrine debates only the words that are attributed to Christ words. Keep on teaching!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments