Submitted by Rubysdad1975 t3_z5dhaw in baltimore
TheCaptainDamnIt t1_ixzjbss wrote
Reply to comment by pk10534 in Five houses targeted for demolition in Mount Vernon historic district by Rubysdad1975
I don't have any 'theory' other than I require 3rd party confirmation of claims other than from the party most benefiting from the claim. Just like I wouldn't 'trust' a used car dealer about the state of a car until I got another mechanic to look it over.
But hey, you do you. Believe those Amazon reviews, don't get a house you're looking to buy inspected (just trust the seller) and please DM me about some land I have to sell. It never floods.
pk10534 t1_iy05w0k wrote
You’re being so facetious right now that it’s absurd. Nobody, and I mean nobody, is saying to not verify their claim. But your allegations still seem unlikely at best.
TheCaptainDamnIt t1_iy0whg2 wrote
I’m not making any allegations, I’m just not believing theirs without further proof. Now would you like to buy a 2003 Honda Accord with only 465,877 miles? Runs perfect, never had a problem. Cash only and you can’t see it first. I mean you wouldn’t ‘make allegations’ against me by not believing me right.
pk10534 t1_iy0xmhc wrote
Buddy the analogy is not really working since nobody said you can’t check on the status of the buildings. I encourage the city to do that. So you’re just not really making the point you think you are. The fact that a possibility exists this church is lying (which you’ve yet to give a credible reason for) does not mean it’s likely.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments