Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

coredenale t1_irtaqru wrote

I've wondered this as well.

Honestly though, while I love that for my other bills, Baltimore has a pretty bad track record.

I constantly hear stories of water bills being insanely high. That alone is not always a big deal, as that can be legit, but when it happens, it would make sense for the city to reach out to confirm, or at least give a heads up. Instead, the city appears to 100% rely on owners to catch any issues with their bill.

On top of that, the city recently got hacked.

It just seems like a bad idea to trust the city with auto-billing, which really should not be the case.

27

Opposite_Selection_3 OP t1_irthosd wrote

I am not saying as a consumer this is the best option but as a City badly wanting to increase collections this seems like a no brainer.

7

Angdrambor t1_irw3bza wrote

>as a City badly wanting to increase collections this seems like a no brainer.

Absolutely not. The cost of lawsuits when your software malfunctions and fucks someone over is going to drastically outweigh any possible collections.

3

MattDaCatt t1_irxqku9 wrote

Unless my water main breaks and I'm out $2000 due to auto billing, rather than being able to have it corrected first.

Also I don't trust BCIT to contract a developer to make the system not save my PIDs in an open format. I was contracted on the ransomware cleanup project and it was a shitshow

1