coredenale t1_irtaqru wrote
I've wondered this as well.
Honestly though, while I love that for my other bills, Baltimore has a pretty bad track record.
I constantly hear stories of water bills being insanely high. That alone is not always a big deal, as that can be legit, but when it happens, it would make sense for the city to reach out to confirm, or at least give a heads up. Instead, the city appears to 100% rely on owners to catch any issues with their bill.
On top of that, the city recently got hacked.
It just seems like a bad idea to trust the city with auto-billing, which really should not be the case.
Opposite_Selection_3 OP t1_irthosd wrote
I am not saying as a consumer this is the best option but as a City badly wanting to increase collections this seems like a no brainer.
Angdrambor t1_irw3bza wrote
>as a City badly wanting to increase collections this seems like a no brainer.
Absolutely not. The cost of lawsuits when your software malfunctions and fucks someone over is going to drastically outweigh any possible collections.
coredenale t1_irtipr2 wrote
Agreed.
MattDaCatt t1_irxqku9 wrote
Unless my water main breaks and I'm out $2000 due to auto billing, rather than being able to have it corrected first.
Also I don't trust BCIT to contract a developer to make the system not save my PIDs in an open format. I was contracted on the ransomware cleanup project and it was a shitshow
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments