Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

cuzimmathug t1_j92z2wd wrote

It's also based on one night out of the entire year, specifically one of the coldest nights of the year, intentionally. The federal theory is that "people who CAN find a place to stay but choose not to during bearable weather will be staying somewhere on the coldest night" as if this somehow makes the count more accurate.

Anyway, if you and some friends scrape together enough money for a motel room on the night of the count, you are not considered homeless and will not be counted.

Source: coordinated the PIT count in the midwest. I have a lot of issues with it and am happy to pop off if anyones interested.

4

DONNIENARC0 t1_j94jhky wrote

How do they even go about contacting/measuring these people in the first place, coldest night of the year or not?

I would guess there’s practically no chance the overwhelming majortity of the homeless have reliable contact info, and having city agents canvass the entire city is a practical nonstarter

I guess it seems like every method I can think of for attempting to track homelessness would be horrible best.

2

cuzimmathug t1_j94uxua wrote

Yeah it is pretty complicated. Some of the bigger cities have lots of canvassers that deploy one night in sections of the city. We had a few volunteers and conducted the count over a few days, but would use the official count date as our point of reference. So the question would be "where are you staying tomorrow night?" or "where did you stay thursday night?" depending on the day.

Lots of cities know where the larger encampments are, though part of what determines a states funding is seeing the numbers go down from year to year. Because of this, lots of shady things take place. In Portland 2 years ago the police swept the local camp sites forcing people to move like 3 days before the count, making it exponentially harder to find and count those people.

2