Submitted by LaRoara42 t3_10ndybj in askscience
Inverted-pencil t1_j6n66hv wrote
Reply to comment by slomobileAdmin in Shouldn't goldilocks zones shift over time? by LaRoara42
I did not mean that distance did not matter at all. But considered that a planet whit lots of volcanic activity and thich atmosphere could do fine at a long distance or perhaps even without a sun at all.
slomobileAdmin t1_j6o4zhe wrote
Ok, I didn't know where you were going with "As long you have liquids" but think I get it now.
You make a good point about the radiated energy of the sun only being converted to heat once it strikes matter. Orbiting high energy reflectors could make a planet habitable closer to a sun. On distant planets, low altitude energy absorbers which reradiate IR could raise surface temps enough to boost biology which conditions the atmosphere favorably.
It wouldn't make much difference on a cosmological scale, but to an intelligent species facing extinction, it might be something they/we would attempt at the edges of goldilocks zones to eek out a few more generations.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments