janoc t1_j5v7tqc wrote
In addition to what /u/electric_ionland said, there is the whole safety thing. If anything goes haywire with the complicated rendezvous and/or docking, you have just put an irreplaceable space asset and 7 people in danger - that in addition to losing whatever samples the spacecraft was returning.
Anything flying to ISS has to be specifically certified for it and the whole approach and docking process needs to be extensively tested before even the first test flight is allowed. Obviously not an option for a one-off deep space mission.
That doesn't mean that this couldn't be done sometime in the future but it is just too impractical and risky today.
stickmanDave t1_j5xc4kn wrote
If it was coming in on a trajectory to decelerate and end up at the space station, then failing to decelerate would result in it passing nowhere near the space station.
Remember, the space station isn't a stationary target. It's tooling a long at 7km/second or so. Everything has to go exactly according to plan for the two to end up at the same place at the same time.
janoc t1_j5xxjvp wrote
You have completely missed my point. The orbital mechanic is a completely different issue and certainly can be calculated so that the two objects meet - we are doing rendezvous and dockings routinely.
The point is that even if you do all of this, carry all that extra fuel (and equipment!) required to decelerate and enter the orbit permitting to dock with the space station - would you want to take the risk?
It is not about "failing to decelerate" and hitting the station as some sort of space projectile. The problem is it would be a spacecraft that has likely not been tested to do this before - and will likely never do this after (deep space missions are usually one-offs). What if something goes wrong during the final approach and puts the station at risk?
We have seen what could happen when the Russian Mir got punctured by some ill-thought maneuvering. Only quick thinking and some crazy heroics by the crew has saved the station. And that was a spacecraft actually designed to dock with the station, equipped for that and one that has just undocked, so it was known to be in working order. Unlike something coming from deep space after who knows how many years - and in who knows what state.
nousernameisleftt t1_j5yaqkr wrote
Are you talking about the 1997 crash? Trying to find more info
[deleted] t1_j5yehk5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j5xjguw wrote
[removed]
gridsandorchids t1_j5z56m5 wrote
He's talking about something going wrong in the final approach to dock, which also shows how complicated the whole concept is. Once you get to a matching orbit, and close enough on a stellar scale, it's still highly delicate and specialized to actually safely recover it.
MIR had a Progress craft smash into it and almost kill the station and inhabitants and it was just docked and then pushed out a bit and brought back in.
[deleted] t1_j5vhhl8 wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments