Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Aseyhe t1_j2838pk wrote

The difference is that you are thinking about orbits fully outside the gravitating body (the star, planet, or moon). In contrast, objects in a galaxy are orbiting inside an extended mass distribution. This means more distant objects feel the gravitational influence of more mass below them.

> Actually, I've just looked up the moon's orbital velocity at 1km/s and low earth orbit as 7km/s so that's the complete opposite of what the simulation implies, which definitely requires prograde burns to increase apoapsis.

Both are correct. You have to speed up to get to a higher orbit, and yet that results in you moving slower on average! As I noted in another comment, that is very interesting because it means gravitational systems have a negative heat capacity (adding energy cools them).

5

Implausibilibuddy t1_j29fiwc wrote

That's a great point I hadn't considered, thanks!

The second point still breaks my brain, but I'm happy to take your word for it that both are true.

2