Submitted by something-stupid2134 t3_zhmf26 in askscience
meme_slave_ t1_iznwitd wrote
Reply to comment by RobusEtCeleritas in What is the difference between atomic, nuclear and hydrogen bombs? by something-stupid2134
Correct me if i am wrong but there aren't any "pure fusion" bombs, to achieve that you'd need to somehow use conventional explosives to heat deuterium and tritium to a couple hundred million degrees and ridiculous unachievable bar.
RobusEtCeleritas t1_iznx823 wrote
Yes, that's what I was saying. There are weapons that are loosely referred to as "pure fusion", but they don't actually purely consist of fusion fuel. Some amount of fission fuel is needed to ignite the thermonuclear burn of the fusion fuel.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments