Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

treefor_js t1_iyw9ick wrote

Reply to comment by ChipotleMayoFusion in Why not use hydrogen and deuterium in fusion reaction rather than tritium and deuterium? by Curious_user4445

That was the conclusion, yes. However, the reasoning was not correct.

Edit: the other thing to note here is not just that it takes a lower temperature to reach higher reaction cross sections but the loss mechanisms that scale with temperature as well. It's a balancing act to keep the plasma warm to use the fusion products to keep burning the fuel without it cooling off rapidly. Bremsstrahlung radiation - x-rays generated by accelerated charged particles, is the main culprit here.

8

ChipotleMayoFusion t1_iywmfex wrote

Ok, thanks for the clarification. Maybe I misunderstood what his post was getting at. I have heard that proton-Boron is basically impossible because the brems losses at the temperature where reactivity is sufficient will always be higher, or almost always higher. I think this is what you are saying, you can't just focus on the temperature. Sam Wurzel had a great talk on this at APS 2021, clarifying Qeng vs Qsci and how that changes depending on your recirculating power fraction and other factors.

2

treefor_js t1_iywn305 wrote

Oh nice. I didn't get a chance to go to that one. Came down with a stomach bug for a day or two in Pittsburgh. Also wish I had time to go to the commercial fusion breakout this year, but alas. There's always next year.

3

ChipotleMayoFusion t1_iywnxfg wrote

I'm glad you were able to attend at all, a lot of the US national labs people were not there due to COVID travel rules.

1

treefor_js t1_iywoopg wrote

I sat in on one of the MagLIF sessions and I think there was one live talk with like 10 recorded ones. It was a weird conference. Basically just networked with university folks. So much better turn out this year with national lab folks returning.

2