Submitted by ArmchairSpinDoctor t3_z0z4ng in askscience
seanyseanerson t1_ixaisic wrote
Reply to comment by Kerfudamapa in Just how dark is deep space? by ArmchairSpinDoctor
So to travel safely in space I guess the ship would have to emit an insane amount of light in all directions to properly monitor for potential collisions. The odds of one are low I guess, but you'd want to know if an object was heading your way.
Perhaps a sort of infrared sonar would be more useful and energy efficient? I dunno.
Arusht t1_ixb2ubr wrote
Like.. insanely low. So low, that I have no idea where you’re at in the world, but if I got into a car right now, closed my eyes, and drove in a straight line.. I would probably have a better chance of hitting your house.
imtoooldforreddit t1_ixbi4oj wrote
Space is really empty
If you're picturing dodging like in star wars flying through asteroid fields, that's not what space is like
In our asteroid belt, average distance from an asteroid to the next closest asteroid is about 100,000 miles
For the probes that have gone through the asteroid belt, they had absolutely no way to know if there was an asteroid coming, because the risk of even a single one was basically negligible.
Saerali t1_ixbsyqj wrote
Oh didn't know it was THAT spread out. How packed would saturn's rings be ?
Exatex t1_ixbxwxj wrote
Very packed - so packed that although the rings are just 10-100m thick, they block most light going though them
run fact edit: Saturns rings are some of the thinnest things known to us. They have a diameter of ~1 million kilometers.
JawnBewty t1_ixcmhdo wrote
The combined mass of everything in the asteroid belt is only about 3% of our moon. And 60% of that is tied up in the four biggest asteroids.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_belt
Insaaaaaaaanely sparse.
tizuby t1_ixciixl wrote
You're off by a factor of 6 with average asteroid distance - and that's just in the most dense parts of our asteroid belt (about ~1,000,000 km or ~620,000mi).
_AlreadyTaken_ t1_ixb1cok wrote
Radar but space is a lot of empty. The biggest problem is likely micrometorites and high energy atomic scale particles chewing away at you.
kendiggy t1_ixcgntm wrote
SONAR (SOund Navigation And Ranging) wouldn't work since sound relies on having an atmosphere or body of water/molecules to travel. RADAR (RAdio Detection And Ranging) would be much more effective because radio waves can actually travel through space.
seanyseanerson t1_ixcsfrh wrote
Thank you. I was thinking of something that sent out pulses of light to read reflections in the same way sonar does but hadn't thought that radar already does the job just fine!
Webs101 t1_ixckas4 wrote
If you’re flying in space, you’re not relying on the visual spectrum to avoid collisions. Radar will work just fine.
[deleted] t1_ixapgew wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments