Submitted by raeflows t3_z3nal3 in askscience
_Oman t1_ixn6ufq wrote
Reply to comment by Alt-One-More in Why doesn’t regular screening improve outcomes for pancreatic cancer patients? by raeflows
The simple version: If the screening were perfect, it would help immensely. When screening isn't perfect and the occurrence rate is is low, screenings can create worse overall outcomes for the general population.
PolarSquirrelBear t1_ixnh2ty wrote
It’s why they won’t test for herpes unless you’re symptomatic. There are so many false-positives you would completely change your life around it, with a possibility that you don’t actually have it.
But with the prevalence of it, you can pretty much just assume you have it anyways.
whatkindofred t1_ixpm12e wrote
If almost everyone has it then where do all the false positives come from?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments