Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

bstabens t1_iwtmeig wrote

Ehm, no, and you are right - having the same side to the sun always doesn't amount to nothing.

No, I was thinking more like two planets, close orbits, the outer slightly faster so it never really leaves the shadow of the inner. But I guess it is physically not possible to have a (two?) stable orbits of two big masses so close together that you'd see the shadow? I mean, even with the moon earth's shadow is so blurred the moon never gets black, just red.

1

HomeAl0ne t1_iwtoy4h wrote

The one further out would actually orbit slightly slower and fall behind.

3

bstabens t1_iwtta6e wrote

As in that's a physical law? Or just we don't have examples to the contrary?

2

Cmagik t1_iwtucqy wrote

Physical law The further away you are the slower you rotate around the object.

5

bstabens t1_iwtucz2 wrote

Scratch that, just thought about it. Of course the dust disk where the planets come from would be slower on the outskirts and fastest at the center.

0

brasticstack t1_iww4uvn wrote

More like those funnel things that you can send coins down when you're at the museum.

1