[deleted] t1_iwth262 wrote
bstabens t1_iwtmeig wrote
Ehm, no, and you are right - having the same side to the sun always doesn't amount to nothing.
No, I was thinking more like two planets, close orbits, the outer slightly faster so it never really leaves the shadow of the inner. But I guess it is physically not possible to have a (two?) stable orbits of two big masses so close together that you'd see the shadow? I mean, even with the moon earth's shadow is so blurred the moon never gets black, just red.
HomeAl0ne t1_iwtoy4h wrote
The one further out would actually orbit slightly slower and fall behind.
bstabens t1_iwtta6e wrote
As in that's a physical law? Or just we don't have examples to the contrary?
Cmagik t1_iwtucqy wrote
Physical law The further away you are the slower you rotate around the object.
bstabens t1_iwtucz2 wrote
Scratch that, just thought about it. Of course the dust disk where the planets come from would be slower on the outskirts and fastest at the center.
brasticstack t1_iww4uvn wrote
More like those funnel things that you can send coins down when you're at the museum.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments