Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

jaxxxtraw t1_iwpjltv wrote

That's the Notorious Rug, do you even need to ask?

276

factfarmer t1_iwpzxir wrote

Notorious rug?

39

Graekaris t1_iwq2u63 wrote

You haven't heard of him? He's notorious.

141

factfarmer t1_iwqfh11 wrote

Apparently I’m out of the loop. I only know about the notorious B.I.G. and R.B.G.

44

Similar_Radish8623 t1_iwqqmtm wrote

Ruggie Ruggie Ruggie, can’t you see: sometimes your facts just hypnotize me

88

Jaksmack t1_iwqvz14 wrote

I just love the things you say,

guess that's why you're smart about primate ways..

44

dmnhntr86 t1_iwq04a6 wrote

Facetious use of "monkey"?

13

Ameisen t1_iwrcnq9 wrote

Apes are monkeys - they're a clade within the catarrhine monkeys. A fairly deeply-originating one at that.

There's no way to define monkeys with apes not being included without being quite paraphyletic.

30

webbphillips t1_iwrvcup wrote

Cool! Does this also mean that all of us mammals are actually mammal-like reptiles?

−2

Ameisen t1_iwsbdu8 wrote

Reptiles are diapsids, while mammals are synapsids. Though it depends on your definition of "reptile", though when amniotes first appeared they very rapidly split into synapsids and diapsids, while apes appeared 10 million years after the first Cattarhines (and aren't significantly different from their closest non-ape relatives).

14

kfederal t1_iwsla13 wrote

Can I pay you to spit evolutionary facts by my bedside while I fall asleep?

6

Ameisen t1_iwsnowq wrote

All the mitochondria in all Eukaryotes are the descendents of a single proto-mitochondrion (likely closely-related to Rickettsoid bacteria) which was engulfed by an early proto-Eukaryotic cell, but was not destroyed.

12