Submitted by nodeciapalabras t3_ylu0ir in askscience
byllz t1_iv4g9lr wrote
Reply to comment by truthseeker1990 in Why don't we have Neandertal mitochondrial DNA? by nodeciapalabras
The answer lies in time. In a given period of time, just from random fluctuations there is a chance the number of surviving lines will decrease, based on how many lines are left and the population. So, given enough time, assuming the population doesn't grow, the chance the number of lines will decrease eventually approaches 100% just like theoretically you can flip a coin as many times as you want and always get head, the chance you will eventually get tails approaches 100%
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments