Submitted by nodeciapalabras t3_ylu0ir in askscience
angelicism t1_iv0stsr wrote
Reply to comment by nodeciapalabras in Why don't we have Neandertal mitochondrial DNA? by nodeciapalabras
Ah so it does mutate. So when Forensic Files says they got an "exact match" it's not necessarily true that one will perfectly match one's mother?
SweetBasil_ t1_iv1b5ch wrote
On average a mitochondrial sequence will have a single mutation every several hundred years. So exact matches are common if it's within ~20 generations or so.
angelicism t1_iv1by71 wrote
So matching mitochondrial DNA doesn't actually mean much in the context of forensics then, because you could also match with your 13th cousin 6 times removed and for all you know there are 17 of them in your village?
(I am zero surprised a TV show is wrong about science, by the way.)
SweetBasil_ t1_iv1d0kn wrote
When you use DNA to match to a suspect, you usually use short tandem repeat (STR) length patterns in nuclear DNA, which change more frequently than nuclear DNA by several orders of magnitude.
angelicism t1_iv1g8e2 wrote
There are multiple episodes specifically about matching mitochondrial DNA with the suspect's mother, which was my specific question. :)
SweetBasil_ t1_iv1h3y7 wrote
should definitely get a nice match with a mother, but i wouldn't put anyone on death row based on that alone :)
nodeciapalabras OP t1_iv0vjj3 wrote
That's right, it mutates even more than nuclear DNA.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments