[deleted] t1_iurslo5 wrote
[removed]
Ltates t1_iusmgbl wrote
The “modern” image you linked is actually a meme and not a modern interpretation of T. rex. It’s because, post 2010s, there was an overcompensation to thicc and feathery tyrannosaurs after the discovery of larger feathered relatives and people went a bit overboard.
Here is the most modern take on Sue the T. rex and an edmontosaur that is displayed in the field museum and made by blue rhino studio. Highly recommend checking out their paleo art and sculptures, they’re gorgeous and very accurate to the known science.
nicolasknight t1_iusofgq wrote
You are entirely correct this was just the closest I could find right now on short notice but it carries the point across.
Still, yours is quite a bit closer to what actual scientists think was reality.
frontal_robotomy t1_ius0y7w wrote
Can you post a different link? Getting a 403 Forbidden error with this one
crazy1000 t1_ius2n4s wrote
frontal_robotomy t1_ius6q79 wrote
Thank you!
[deleted] t1_iush2jj wrote
[removed]
echosixwhiskey t1_iux8l4h wrote
Ok but where are the little arms? If it had a beak then wouldn’t that have fossilized too? What happened to the teeth?
[deleted] t1_ius14az wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iusenaq wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iusemvf wrote
[removed]
wattnurt t1_iurthvk wrote
>https://external-preview.redd.it/1aIib08nONHHJ-HNABoUWlocs_vwrNtJs58e24xoAXE.jpg?auto=webp&s=0a3f619388dd232694481d68f346cc0d65e28224
I had never seen this, but man that makes so much more sense. Essentially a flightless bird with vestigial wing arms.
Similarly, this is an owl skeleton.
danby t1_iusfjb0 wrote
There's still a lot of arguments over what kind of musculature and what types of feathers and how sparse they might have been so that actual appearance is still open to a lot of artistic interpretation, but there's increasing evidence that many dinosaurs would have been feathered. And we have fossil evidence of this for about 50 species (I think)
And for T.Rex we know that some close relatives had feathers: https://institutions.newscientist.com/article/mg25133560-800-t-rex-with-feathers-chinas-fossils-are-rewriting-the-dinosaur-story/
Tiktaalik414 t1_iusp3py wrote
I’m having a hard time believing the scientific validity of that image given that Saitama from One Punch Man is drawn next to it. I don’t doubt that T. Rex had feathers of some sort, but I don’t believe they were as fluffy as this drawing would have you believe. If anything I would guess they probably looked more like a cassowary with a long meaty tail
[deleted] t1_iusq4oz wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iurzps8 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iuseon7 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iusjkjl wrote
[removed]
oracle427 t1_iusrfnp wrote
Wait what? That is the modern rendering of a trex? That looks nothing like the original ones
[deleted] t1_iuv58w0 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iutd5vd wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_ius0d9t wrote
[deleted]
notabillionaire__yet t1_ius0ytj wrote
Is there another link for that image? I'm just getting an error when I click on it
nicolasknight t1_iuseqe8 wrote
notabillionaire__yet t1_iut02tv wrote
Thanks! That's fascinating!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments