Submitted by Snoo-82132 t3_y9a6rk in askscience
Alblaka t1_it7higx wrote
Reply to comment by kazarnowicz in Is building dams a learned behaviour for beavers? by Snoo-82132
> In denying other conscious life forms their consciousness, we have also stunted our understanding of it.
Word.
It's not going to be easy to clearly define (if ever possible) what kind (or even individual!) of animal contains what level of consciousness, but the very least we can do is recognize that it's not a binary toggle, and that we're far from alone on one side. Heck, for all we know we might not even be the extreme of the scale.
I'm hoping we can figure this out, at least partially, before true sentient AI comes into play.
kazarnowicz t1_it7nfnp wrote
This is what really intrigues me, because when I was looking into physics and consciousness I realized that there's nothing in currently understood physics that prevents consciousness to be the fundamental nature of the universe, rather than emerging from matter.
If that is true, then I'd wager you need biological components when creating a sentient AI (or technology that today is indistinguishable from magic).
Alblaka t1_it7ut8g wrote
If so, yes. That's a pretty big if tho. Might be why decoding whale / orca language could be the next big step in AI development: Being able to communicate with other beings that may be sapient (aka holding consciousness) as well is going to be the only way in which we might be able to truly understand what common denominators constitute consciousness... only then would we be able to replicate it artificially (unless we succeed at that by accident).
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments