Submitted by Dr-Logan t3_yhb1b8 in askscience
orange_cactuses t1_iug1u9v wrote
Reply to comment by someonesomewheredoin in is there such a thing as "Big Boned?" by Dr-Logan
Body types are real, especially when relating to skeletal structure. For ex. Some men have naturally wider shoulders by clavicle length not by muscularity.
someonesomewheredoin t1_iug7h3b wrote
Anatomy differences are indeed real, the problem is when you start linking metabolism with anatomy without being able to back it up.
We're making steady progress in genomics, in not the so far future (maybe in 20, 30 years?), we'll be able to access it, through some sort of GWAS (genome-wide association study) and epigenetics studies -- until then, it's just some arbitrary and often subjective classification, with different meanings for different people.
I do believe that it's fine to use those terms on casual conversations, the problem comes with the random information that, usually, comes with it and sometimes can hinder people's progress (see my other comment as to why i think that, under this parent comment).
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments