Submitted by grumble11 t3_y1rwe6 in askscience
So current genetic testing of IVF embryos is to get the egg and sperm together, make a bunch of embryos, wait a few days to see which ones grow and then to pop them open, scrape out a bunch of cells and then send them to the lab. The lab then tests those cells for any abnormalities (aneuploidy, etc) while the embryos get frozen. Once results are back the cleared embryos can be implanted one at a time until one takes.
So there has been some research on childhood cancer risk of frozen embryos and that seems to be a bit elevated relative to standard - 1.6-1.7 times.
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1004078
This is still a fairly new process and we don’t know if there are any impacts later in life from freezing, it’s an open question as frozen embryo children hit middle age. Fingers crossed.
My question was on the genetic testing side. If you have an embryo and pop it open and remove a bunch of the very first cells, then the remaining cells step up and still deliver a baby. That is established. What impacts might arise from the cell removal process though? Like if you were going to have 100 cells at that point and are now down to 90 or whatever then would that have any impacts later in life? The remaining cells need to divide more I guess. Thoughts?
meathole t1_is0tm37 wrote
The cells are not taken from the embryo directly, they are taken from the Trophectoderm which is comprised of extra-embryonic tissue which does not become part of the fetus itself. Cells in the Trophectoderm become part of the support structure for the fetus like the placenta.