Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

konwiddak t1_is1fubu wrote

I don't believe we think there was a selective pressure to get rid of it. However mutations and differences don't necessarily happen in isolation - it could have been that the ape who had the original mutation might have happened to be exceptionally strong/smart/fertile (or plain "lucky") and therefore it was advantageous for his genes to propagate despite the flaw.

2

NewBromance t1_is1g673 wrote

Almost like the gene piggybacked of another gene.

Ape has a gene that means he can't make vitamin C, but that doesn't matter because he gets it all from his diet. However he also has a bunch of useful genes that make him more successful and so him and his descendents do very well and thr defective vitamin C gene goes along for the ride?

1

konwiddak t1_is1vwfb wrote

Pretty much, the vitamin C gene could have been completely unconnected to the success of this genetic lineage. We don't really know, this is just a theory - it could have also been that there was a forest fire and only one family of apes survived.

2