Submitted by spiteful_rr_dm_TA t3_11vamkr in askscience
spiteful_rr_dm_TA OP t1_jcsedfd wrote
Reply to comment by Alexander_Schwann in What is the ultimate fate of rocky bodies? by spiteful_rr_dm_TA
So it will basically stick around forever, unless things like protons have an eventual half life?
mfb- t1_jcsg4pp wrote
It's hard to imagine a scenario where protons are absolutely stable. If there is no other process then gravity should be able to make them decay via virtual black holes. But assuming they are absolutely stable you expect the nuclei fuse/split to form iron and nickel over time and stay like that forever.
spiteful_rr_dm_TA OP t1_jctgsoy wrote
Can you explain or point to a source for how decay by virtual black holes work? I've never heard of this
mfb- t1_jctjnsf wrote
Let's look at the weak interaction first, it has a very similar situation: A top quark is so heavy that it can decay to a bottom quark plus a W boson. The W boson then decays to other particles. How can a neutron decay via the weak interaction? It's much lighter than a W boson, it cannot decay to it. It still couples to the associated field, however, and that couples to the decay products of a neutron. You never produce a real W boson in that decay but it allows a neutron to decay to proton+electron+antineutrino. Mathematically we can calculate the probability of this process using virtual particles. They are not real (hence the name), but they have some similarities to the real particles.
Back to gravity: If you shoot two protons at each other with an absurdly high energy then you can create a black hole. The black hole will then decay to a variety of particles, could involve protons but it doesn't have to - black holes don't differentiate between matter and antimatter. Random protons in a cold Earth don't have that energy, but they still interact via gravity, so just like for the W boson case there should be a decay process via virtual black holes. We can't calculate what proton lifetime that will produce (besides "absurdly long") and of course we cannot confirm something experimentally that we don't expect to happen even a single time over the next quadrillion years - but the process should be possible.
spiteful_rr_dm_TA OP t1_jcu8qvl wrote
Interesting, thanks for the answer!
Alexander_Schwann t1_jcxug1t wrote
Yes. As far as we know according to the laws of physics as we understand them, rocky bodies like the Earth do not have a lifespan like stars do, and unless they are consumed by something else, they are likely to drift around forever.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments