Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BitsAndBobs304 OP t1_jb9zei5 wrote

Do you have an idea of how big the effect is then? Below 0,1% efficiency decrease for a thin cotton kitchen rag?

−1

[deleted] t1_jb9zzgb wrote

[removed]

1

BitsAndBobs304 OP t1_jba02ah wrote

Haha okay ;)

1

FBogg t1_jba5l1e wrote

it wouldn't be a loss of efficiency; the energy transfer will always be 100% efficient. It will however reduce the power consumption, as someone else said with a relation ship of inverse square. the material thickness will affect energy transfer by a large amount

1

BitsAndBobs304 OP t1_jba5seb wrote

>t will however reduce the power consumption

what?

−1

FBogg t1_jbapyjf wrote

further distance between magnetic elements = weaker magnetic force = lower transmission at constant line voltage.

1

GhostBurger12 t1_jba0qvp wrote

Use pieces of wood of different thicknesses, a set volume of water, and a small pot.

Test & time how long it takes the water to reach a rolling boil.

1

BitsAndBobs304 OP t1_jba1baq wrote

a difference of 1-3% could be significant in expenses over a year but would be hard to detect reliably in home experiments without going for countless tests

1

GhostBurger12 t1_jba1xzl wrote

1-3% still isn't much, because that's only the net power used by the induction plate, vs your total daily power usage.

If you have a desktop computer & graphics card, that's probably eating more of your power.

2

BitsAndBobs304 OP t1_jba62z8 wrote

computers lower their consumption when they're not being used to full computational requirements

0