Submitted by TheIronKurtin t3_110uph4 in askscience
_Fuck_Im_Dead_ t1_j8btz5a wrote
It does. You might notice that the inside of a fireplace has practically zero soot, just ash... and the inside of the chimney where it is not actively on fire (hopefully) gets caked with soot. Eventually the soot (creosote really) will get caked up enough to slow the draw through the chimney, causing heat buildup, and potentially a chimney fire. A chimney fire will indeed burn off the soot, but also likely damaging the chimney and possibly burning the house down.
TheIronKurtin OP t1_j8d9liz wrote
This makes a lot of sense. Thanks for the great explanation!
_Fuck_Im_Dead_ t1_j8e2g18 wrote
No problem! I definitely don't know all this because I caused a chimney fire in my own chimney. Definitely not. 🤐
thred_pirate_roberts t1_j8fkxcz wrote
I also definitely did not start a chimney fire.
It was a dryer lint fire.
[deleted] t1_j8ftrgs wrote
[removed]
desolation0 t1_j8ec1qm wrote
As to why it doesn't burn up before leaving the fire itself? Usually that means there wasn't enough oxygen to burn with all the carbon. Oxygen is the other ingredient of making a flame. When it has left the direct flame, it then needs to be hot enough to ignite even if there is now an abundance of nearby oxygen. When you see sparkly embers up in the flame, that's a bit of hot carbon finally being close enough to some oxygen to burn.
[deleted] t1_j8ehnhw wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments