Submitted by BrndNwAccnt t3_10y6emc in askscience
UnamedStreamNumber9 t1_j7yxz5x wrote
Reply to comment by stdio-lib in Is the relative contribution to global warming of greenhouse gasses settled science? by BrndNwAccnt
Methane breaks down to CO2. The discrepancy is mostly like due to one method looking at the “instantaneous” warming effect vs the warming for total time in atmosphere. Methane warm at the greater rate for 3-5 years before breaking down to CO2. CO2 in the atmosphere has a residence time on the order of a century. So, methane has the much higher warming potential (84x) by integrating its 3-5 years at 25x CO2 and then another century at same as CO2
Any-Broccoli-3911 t1_j7z0pwq wrote
If you average 5 years of 25x and 100 years of 1x, compared to 100 years of 1x (CO2), that's 2.25x in average.
The long term average will always be smaller than the short term one.
Mutex70 t1_j7zg2mw wrote
It's the right idea, but wrong numbers. Methane has a much higher immediate impact than CO2 (~84x CO2). As it breaks down over time, the reduces to same as CO2.
The comparative effect over 100 years is approximately 25x CO2
https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/oil-gas-and-coal/methane-emissions_en
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments