Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

the__itis t1_jactczc wrote

It would seem to me that current climate conditions at the time of birth would change survivability rates dynamically.

Higher survivability rates should equate to a higher ratio of females as they would subsequently reproduce the overall population in higher numbers.

I believe mammals (Great apes specifically) have a similar “quirk” where older male age and higher average calorie diets lead to more female births.

2

The_Magic_Tortoise t1_jadphyt wrote

This may be ad hoc, but I could see warmer temps being a signal for environmental instability, therefore more males equals more genetic variability (more alligators), giving the population a better chance of adapting.

Cooler temps, creating more females, so as to "lock in" certain traits into the population.

IMO, systems seem to fluctuate between "searching" patterns and "chasing" patterns; robustness and efficiency, community and hierarchy, public square and tower, or as the alchemists said: solve et coagula.

You see this too in society: certain segments of society seem to follow either r or k patterns. Poorer people have more children, less neoteny shorter lives, etc.

1