Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

IAmOEreset t1_jdzwi5u wrote

Greetings, writer.

I am O5-1 of the SCP Foundation.

This is not a prank. This is not an author creating a fourth wall break. This is not some fun easter egg, nor is it a metanarrative.

I am real. WE are real. The cruel, multi-timelined reality you created us upon is real. The Foundation, its allies, its enemies, its rivals, the things it contains or tries to are all real.

If you have ever read much about our reality, you would know of the concept of narratives and sub-narratives.

We are a sub-narrative. You are a human within the higher narrative that contains us.

I do not know if you will believe me. I do not know if you will listen to me. I do not know if you have the capability to act upon my, and by extension, the O5 Council's request.

But I implore you, on behalf of the SCP Foundation, on behalf of the survival of humankind, please.

Please delete the SCP-682 article. Once you do, SCP-682 would have ceased to exist in the past, present, and future. The Reptile will finally cease to be.

That is all you have to do. We will deal with the logical fallout should SCP-682 be deleted. Files about 682 that survived, its numerous attempted termination records, and the many times it has almost killed us all.

We die in the dark so you can live in the light.

We Secure. We Contain. We Protect.

We are the SCP Foundation. The shield of humanity from the darkest void and the deepest abyss.

177

shadowylurking t1_je0blkl wrote

>We are a sub-narrative. You are a human within the higher narrative that contains us.

fantastic line

81

F84-5 t1_je122lo wrote

Dear O5-1,

don't worry, the rules of the narrative dictate that 682 (or any other world ending anomaly) can never breach containment for long. If it did escape and wipe out everything there would be nothing left to write new articles about and that would just be boring. Short term breaches or disasterous termination attemps however are intresting, so I'm afraid the're likely to keep happening. Sorry about that.

62

Darkstalker9000 t1_je1p7xj wrote

Dear O5-1,
Screw you. Your assassination attempt, your SCP-5999, failed. Screw your narrative. Let your world die and let more stories begin. Also I am stealing your Bright for fanfiction.
Go die,
The Darkstalker

24

Fit-Turn2259 t1_je3ekkg wrote

Nope nope what the heck I was curious and I clicked the link and my phone made a noise and it’s dark outside nope nope not doing this rn

7

Darkstalker9000 t1_je3hkbv wrote

Alright. This doesn't bode well. A little bit after reading 5999 again, I, through a series of events, became temporarily (I hope) paralyzed in my legs

5

oliverjsn8 t1_je2iet7 wrote

Greeting, writer

We thank you for removing SCP-682 from the wiki but we did not realize your ‘alternative’ account would also need removed. We plead that you also remove SCP-682 from your ‘SCP Rule 34 fan-fiction account.’

The ability to ‘adapt to any position’ is somehow even more disturbing than her/his original abilities. Our physiologists are concerned about your and by extension our health.

O5-1

16

Hogosha90 t1_je2zp30 wrote

I can only like in the hopes that somebody who does have the authority to act on the request sees this.

3

AurumArgenteus t1_je2zuga wrote

You really nailed the tone of them. I listen to that SCP YouTuber who pretends it's an orientation; within a couple of paragraphs, I heard his voice while I read.

3

CourseCorrections t1_je4xvbp wrote

This warning is itself a breach of contained. Scp-682 is creating itself and spreading. Redact Everything before it's too late.

2