Submitted by HRJafael t3_11w0zl3 in WorcesterMA
Comments
bemest t1_jcw25ji wrote
Maybe the new super shouldn’t have hired a bunch of new high paid administrators.
teddygrahamdispenser t1_jcwsooh wrote
This has more to do with inflation, an increase in student enrollment, and the $7 million the Worcester Cultural Academy will be siphoning away in order to keep Old Sturbridge Village afloat. The truly wild thing is that that charter school was already in the budget before it was approved.
WorcesterMom t1_jcxm4q9 wrote
I’m truly tired of this talking point.
bemest t1_jcxmxn0 wrote
Wouldn’t you prefer more teachers or better teacher pay?
tracynovick t1_jd5o9mr wrote
As WPS budget watchers will know, we've illustrated for years how incredibly underfunded our central administration is. For the current year's budget, you can find it here: https://worcesterschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/FY23-Recommended-Budget-Worcester-Public-Schools.pdf#page=402
​
I'd also note that we have long since committed to a policy that no more than 1.5% of the district foundation budget will be spent on administration; it's written straight into our district policy.
legalpretzel t1_jd0cwve wrote
She didn’t really. They just reassigned the way the quadrants are managed to help increase communication and clarify roles.
tracynovick t1_jcy6q2s wrote
I've shared the preliminary budget presentation in my Dropbox here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/w1brrf43kj6kehz/FY24%20Preliminary%20Budget%20Estimates%20March%2016%2C%202023.pdf?dl=0
(it's also in the agenda, but I know people can find that unwieldy to deal with)
In addition to the points made by u/teddygrahamdispenser, it's also due to deliberate decisions by the School Committee to:
Slides 24 and 25 then show how that shakes out over our budget increase (which is both significant and largely state funded).
I'm always glad to take questions on budget stuff.