Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Actor412 t1_j5btuwj wrote

Reply to comment by Hondaccord in WA lawmakers propose bill requiring clergy to report child abuse by littleblackcar

No, when the bill came up to regulate pregnancy crisis centers (ie, force them to tell the truth and not lie to ypung mothers), Catholic groups lined up to fight it. Which isnt surprisong since most of them are run by the RCC.

It didnt pass, thanks to them.

6

Hondaccord t1_j5bu0yz wrote

I’m referring to the child abuse/mandated reporter bill.

−1

Actor412 t1_j5clok6 wrote

Huh. So even though there has been no hearings on this bill, that it hasn't even been presented to a committee, you claim that "no church testified against it." Since that doesn't make sense, and I assumed you were here in good faith and actually read my post, it was logical to conclude that you were talking about the failed bill on pregnancy crisis centers.

0

Hondaccord t1_j5dcm4u wrote

You wanna double check that? HB 1098

2

Actor412 t1_j5doj57 wrote

So? You wrote a very bad sentence, something that I took at face value, and gave you the reasons why I read it that way. You don't like it? Then learn how to write.

−2

Hondaccord t1_j5f829v wrote

Big feelings over here. I’m just trying to help give more information on these bills.

1

Actor412 t1_j5g11bp wrote

Then why not just post the links? Why bother replying to some random redditor? You sound like someone with a hidden agenda.

0

Hondaccord t1_j5gwdah wrote

Yup I’m on here to spread a conspiracy by giving factual information about bills and the legislature when people make posts about it.

0

Actor412 t1_j5h274v wrote

All you've done is made a comment about a bill that was introduced two weeks ago. Do you have a source for that "factual information"? You could have posted it by now, you know.

0

Hondaccord t1_j5hazyh wrote

It wasn’t just introduced, it passed out of committee. And I’m commenting about it because it’s what this whole post is about?

0

Actor412 t1_j5ht4p1 wrote

1- If you wanted to comment, you'd make you own thread, instead of commenting on mine. Why bother?

2- The only thing of value you've said on this thread is your claim that "the CC supports it." That was several replies ago. Your signal-to-noise ratio lays heavily on the noise side.

3- If you want to give me a link about the CCs attitude towards the bill, I'd like to read it.

0