Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

onlyinyaks t1_jdlcj60 wrote

Reply to comment by Druskell in Fun fact: 62% of U.S. states have an official language, but Washington doesn't by so-unobvious

If all legal documents/services included alternate translations, how would that impede on freedom of speech? No hate, Genuinely curious.

1

Druskell t1_jdrwtl5 wrote

That isn't what I said.

  1. "a language FORCED to be used" meaning disallowing individuals and communities to use what ever language they want. Freedom of speech is saying what you want how you want. You want to protest is in Portugese, or via interpretive dance... go for it.
  2. I was saying I like documents having multiple translations, or at least having access to translated versions of the same document. would not violated freedom of speech.
1