Submitted by Plonsky2 t3_11cjbd3 in Washington
Fupatown t1_ja5f8en wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in WA auctions off more ‘old’ forest in $2.8 million sale by Plonsky2
The forest was harvested ~ 100 years ago is that "old growth"? Reality is old growth is a concept like any other and there are forests being managed that way (Nat'l parks, wilderness areas, etc) however timber is one of the only truly renewable resources we have. Consider this, the forest was harvested a century ago and I'm going to take a guess and say that they probably didn't do any tree planting or sustainable practices of any kind. Now 100 years later it's come back in full force and this time when we harvest it'll actually be managed post harvest and carefully done as opposed to back then. Do you think the forest will grow back to a similar condition in 100 years from now? Forest management is on a different time scale than human life times and I think the general public doesn't realize it...
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments