Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

SkySweeper656 t1_j65l969 wrote

This is an avenue id rather not explore.

The idea of a computer injecting me with something it created itself is horrifying and Id rather die on my own terms than possibly be killed on an extinction-level deary injection.

Both end with death but at least one doesnt have me witnessing the fall of mankind to an injection by killer AI.

Yes ive seen a lot of scifi movies lmao

−11

Aphrozen t1_j65lg2s wrote

That’s why we let the Guinea pigs go first lol

8

SkySweeper656 t1_j65m9h6 wrote

Who's to say it's not a long-term release thing? Or is designed to only kill human biology? Or even worse, its designed to react to a signal that, if activated, kills the host. And we all carry around tiny transmitters in our pockets these days.

AI is the end of humanity, in one way or another. We already have it generating music for us and creating art for us with seemingly no effort to us. Now we have it creating our cures?

Humanity is doomed.

−8

Aphrozen t1_j65mlun wrote

I’m sure they said the same thing about the internet— hell, I think when the nuke was invented. But we adapt and overcome as we always will. Besides, we really aren’t important enough for that level of interest. Vast majority of the world do basic jobs, go home, drink, watch tv, and sleep. Nothing of importance worth controlling

4

SkySweeper656 t1_j65nq3p wrote

This is different though. This is talking about creating something that thinks

That is no longer a tool or a weapon. That is something sentient to me.

−3

Aphrozen t1_j65nzwg wrote

Then I guess we better adapt or die as a species— AI is inevitable, just up to us to be ready for the better or worse of its fallouts

5