Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_j3k18yr wrote

Reminder: this subreddit is meant to be a place free of excessive cynicism, negativity and bitterness. Toxic attitudes are not welcome here.

All Negative comments will be removed and will possibly result in a ban.


I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Wingsto t1_j3k2ax3 wrote

I reuse a single use….they can be washed too.

70

Lazy__Astronaut t1_j3k73y1 wrote

When are disposable vapes going to be banned?

I'll see at least 3 discarded on my 5 minute walk to work, never once seen plastic plates/cutlery

230

Healyhatman t1_j3kbh70 wrote

Something that you use for 5 minutes shouldn't last 500 years.

66

Throwaway2600k t1_j3kdxqn wrote

Yet plastic water bottles remain. And novelty toys that kids and adults will play with for few minutes and then they go in the trash.

68

Sonyguyus t1_j3kfjo8 wrote

I wish they had the intelligence here in America to ban single use plastics in restaurants too. I’m sure there’d be enough lobbiests to “persuade” the politicians that workers need to keep making them to stay employed. Instead of adapting to greener laws, we choose to pollute the planet because of “jobs”

13

FlatRobots t1_j3kjuj9 wrote

That's great. Small steps in the right direction compound over time.

2

bc4284 t1_j3kqn9w wrote

And this is why we need ubi. Anyone with half a brain can see that high employment rates at 40 hrs a week is unsustainable. There just are t enough things that need doing by people to justify it . We need to move beyond the idea that everyone needs to have a job that pays enough per hour to work 40 He’s a week and just subsidize keeping people with a universal basic amount of income for basic needs. If people want more than the basic needs then they can work, working should provide a means of having extra not provide the means of surviving

−1

Teoflux t1_j3kqxbv wrote

Funny enough alot of people get upset by the biodegradable replacement, whenever they ask if we have single use cutlery in the shop i work at.

They almost seem insulted by the very idea.

22

selfconciousbadger t1_j3kubo5 wrote

Where I live it has become increasingly common to get disposable wooden cutlery; I think it’s made from bamboo.

9

sg3niner t1_j3kuqx2 wrote

Where, exactly do you think the money for UBI is going to come from?

If you take a fairly conservative $1200 a month to cover rent, food, and basic utilities (not including internet or phone or ANYTHING else) and multiply that by 2/3 of the US population, that's 2.8 Trillion dollars a year.

Trillion.

There's no way you can do that that wouldn't make the inflation we're currently seeing look like the tiniest little blip in history.

4

FreshTongue t1_j3kyg00 wrote

Make this worldwide, and usage of plastic is going to fall down drastically

4

AftyOfTheUK t1_j3m0ety wrote

Is this actually uplifting?

It doesn't appear anyone even attempted to quantify the damage they're claiming these things do. Lots of people will now be inconvenienced, and we don't even know if it's a good idea or not.

1

bigThinc t1_j3m4val wrote

a trillion dollars is 1/25th of last year’s american gdp.

people fail to realize that the main drivers of inflation aren’t people — they’re corporations

related example: while inflation and interest rates are both high, reserve requirement ratios for banks are still zero. theoretically, this gives big enough banks carte blanche to print as much money as they want, driving inflation.

4

dizzyhobo t1_j3m4xl0 wrote

Now you can join us in the hell that is cardboard cutlery.

5

its8up t1_j3m6n3e wrote

You know what food that overcooked and bland does to teeth? They don't develop properly because they're trying to run away. Can't see it being any easier for plastic to endure.

−7

Mannielf t1_j3m6z9t wrote

What are the potential benefits of keeping them / risks getting rid of them?

My knowledge on this is as basic as it comes, but getting rid of something that takes 100s of years to breakdown and replace them with stuff that doesn’t take 100s of years to breakdown seems like a good idea

3

thatnitai t1_j3m72gh wrote

What is the solution for takeout food?

3

DedicatedDdos t1_j3m7uwx wrote

And plastic is everywhere, majority of those aren't recyclable so that just gets tossed on ever-growing garbage dumps, if it even gets there, a lot just ends up drifting on the wind or floating in the ocean. And we barely even scratched the surface of the potential health and environmental consequences of our plastic use (such as the rather strong links between plastics and loss of fertility).

But hey, a slight wood taste definitely seems like the bigger issue here, understandable.

And no, banning single use plastics isn't the solution to end all plastic problems.

5

JillStinkEye t1_j3m836e wrote

A large chunk comes from being about to completely dissolve a lot of governmental assistance programs. You still have the assistance money that would have been given out, but without the extreme overhead of bureaucracy. All the red tape for the most common welfare situations is absurd.

1

anonymousforever t1_j3m88al wrote

There have been a few business models using reusable bowls/lids for takeout where a deposit is charged and you get it back when you return the dishes. Don't return it, and the money is forfeit so the company can replace what you kept. This could work for delivery, could still do a "hub" or "dash" service, but the return part is on you, since the driver may not go back there.

Alternatively, bringing your own could be doable, as long as it's "in store take out". People just have to realize portions will be by piece or weight, or a measured serving scoop, so bringing an oversize container won't net more food.

3

DaenerysMomODragons t1_j3m8gf0 wrote

This. Though there are some degradable products being made recently that are much better, but if a restaurant only has straws that degrade before I'm done drinking, or utensils that make the food taste nasty, I just won't shop there any more.

0

CeaRhan t1_j3m9365 wrote

The amount of pollution produced by the plastic you'll have to buy and rebuy and rebuy over again once it gets stolen will be far greater than wooden forks/plates that will go back to the planet and which you can get easily by simply planting trees

5

DaenerysMomODragons t1_j3m97pd wrote

I think back to when I was young and they banned paper bags from grocery stores because super thin plastic bags were said to be better for the environment. It seems like environmentalism is just cyclical. Give it 20-30 years and they'll be banning paper/wood straws/utensils, just wait.

Edit: Now that I think about it more, they could try to standardize people brining their own permanent utensils, and sell permanent utensils to those who forget them, just like how grocery stores now will sell you cloth bags.

4

DedicatedDdos t1_j3m9i6c wrote

Some googling gives me data from 2019 at around ~50kg per person per year for countries like the USA (53kg), Australia (59kg), UK (44kg). From here.

That's estimated single use plastics, not other trash.

Keeping in mind that the majority of plastics aren't recyclable and a lot of them don't even get to the garbage dumps.

And besides the rather small portion of people that actually need things like straws for medical reasons for which there are always exceptions provided, who exactly will get inconvenienced?

Edit; To add to this, we know reducing plastic use is good, any reduction is good, gotta start somewhere.

4

AftyOfTheUK t1_j3mc0or wrote

>Some googling gives me data from 2019 at around ~50kg per person per year for countries like the USA (53kg), Australia (59kg), UK (44kg). From here.
>
>That's estimated single use plastics, not other trash.

That's quantifying how much plastic is used. I asked for quantification of the damage/harm caused.

>To add to this, we know reducing plastic use is good

That's my entire point. We don't.

−1

AftyOfTheUK t1_j3mcf3d wrote

>What are the potential benefits of keeping them

As the people who are buying them? Various options exist, but some people still buy the plastic option - they obviously perceive benefits - maybe price, maybe functionality, maybe hygiene.

> getting rid of something that takes 100s of years to breakdown

In landfill, that doesn't matter, we're not running out of landfill space for sporks.

−1

ryanocerous92 t1_j3melgr wrote

That's great. Now do animal agriculture, invest in public transport, and clean energy.

0

DedicatedDdos t1_j3mff2m wrote

>That's my entire point. We don't.

Yes, we do.

knock yourself out I'd say, plenty of research on this subject.

I'll provide you with a single excerpt, again you're free to dive deeper into this.

>Plastic contains chemical additives, most of which remain unknown or understudied. Meanwhile, many of the chemicals additives for which scientific information is available are known to be toxic. A growing body of evidence points to the health risks posed by plastic additives. These include endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), which are linked to infertility, obesity, diabetes, prostate or breast cancer, among others. Other health conditions linked to additives include reproductive, growth, and cognitive impairment and neurodevelopment disorders.

there's plenty of research that needs to be done still in this field if we want an accurate picture, but what we know already is pretty damning.

And that is only the health aspect of it. Like I said in my previous comment, most plastics aren't recyclable, so that's 50 kilo per person per year that gets tossed somewhere, anywhere, you're free to do the math on how much avoidable waste that is globally.

On that note, show me a fish, and I'll show you plastic.

1

Mannielf t1_j3mga9z wrote

I agree that various options should be available, but there’s always going to be a line. E.g. You can’t buy asbestos insulation anymore.

I disagree with ‘we aren’t running out of landfill space for sporks.’ Its not about having space for sporks now, it’s about the impact plastics have in the future. These are small steps, but when there’s a cleaner solution, it’s silly to use a more harmful option.

0

Yosyp t1_j3mhw7u wrote

I reckon that the majority of plastic cutlery can't be washed in the dishwasher as they release dangerous microplastics. not even accounting the fact that they bend easily

9

AftyOfTheUK t1_j3mimyl wrote

>there's plenty of research that needs to be done still in this field

Doesn't appear to be any kind of quantification of damage, however. The size of the problem appears to be unknown, but we can conclude it's relatively small, otherwise it would be easier to detect and quantify.

>On that note, show me a fish, and I'll show you plastic.

Plastic that didn't make it to a landfill or incinerator, sure. But when properly disposed of, that's not an issue.

−1

AftyOfTheUK t1_j3miyfu wrote

>E.g. You can’t buy asbestos insulation anymore.

This is a really good example, because asbestos insulation was directly linked to a huge number of deaths and chronic debilitating ilnesses.

We were able to get a rough quantification of the damage done to people's lives, and we decided to (mostly) get rid of asbestos because that damage was very high.

So I'm asking - what level of damage is being caused by plastics used within this country (the ones that can be controlled by legislation) - how much harm/damage is caused.

If it's a lot, we should get rid of it. If it's not, then we shouldn't be banning it.

>I disagree with ‘we aren’t running out of landfill space for sporks.’ Its not about having space for sporks now, it’s about the impact plastics have in the future.

What impact do you believe plastics disposed of in a landfill (or incinerator) will have on you in the future?

−1

murphydcat t1_j3mo1cv wrote

Apparently, the residents of my neighborhood have never heard of this "trash" thing, as I find scores of plastic water bottles discarded in my local park, gutters on my street of floating down the stream behind my house.

1

KlausVonChiliPowder t1_j3mpmal wrote

I'm pretty sure technology handles most of the manufacturing of this stuff anyway. I wouldn't be surprised if grocery and restaurant chains are investing much more in lobbying for banning the stuff, claiming some sort of environmental concern, but really so they can point to politicians for shifting the cost to the consumer.

People are still going to buy plastic utensils and bags. Especially, those of us who reuse these things. Now we get to buy it ourselves. Unfortunately it's going to be the poorer communities who are most affected because they rely on these things, especially plastic bags.

1

Picolete t1_j3mqvcz wrote

"Hey mate, you have a loicense for that plastic knife?"

2

KlausVonChiliPowder t1_j3mra3g wrote

I'm poor and rely on the free plastic bags to both carry my food for the walk home, a large amount since I can only make it twice a month to the store, and then we use them again at home for trash lining/cat litter/etc.

The real problem is a lack of perspective from the upper-middle classes, believing everyone can shoulder the cost of this feel-good legislation that isn't going to have a significant impact on the environment considering how reliant we are on the stuff for nearly everything we own. Guess what. We're just going to have to buy the plastic bags now.

Give up your phone, TV, car, PlayStation, etc and then let's go after the 10 or so, super thin, poorly manufactured bags I use a month.

3

CaliSouther t1_j3mu9a5 wrote

If they are going to do this, they also need to ban all the plastic they use to package everything.

5

Sonyguyus t1_j3muf8f wrote

It would hurt those living in poverty much more, you’re right. Hopefully banning single use plastics can help push using recycled papers and biodegradable plastics made from corn. Maybe some grocery stores can offer free reusable bags for signing up like to Walmart or Sams clubs. It can be figured out but you gotta take that first step sometime or else it’ll always be this way.

1

LanaDelHeeey t1_j3myvjc wrote

Idk about in the UK, but where I am you can’t buy flavored pods anymore since the public outrage a few years ago got them pulled from shelves. So now your options are either buy tobacco flavored pods (which taste awful) or get disposables which last equally as long as a pack of pods and come in good flavors. The reason disposables are so popular is because they come in good flavors. If good flavors for like juul were allowed again, you would see the popularity of disposables die off greatly and this type of littering to diminish.

But you know it’s all “think of the children” when nicotine already has the same level of restriction that alcohol does and nobody’s saying you shouldn’t be selling pink whitney because it tastes good to children.

7

produit1 t1_j3n28t9 wrote

Manufacturers such as coca cola are to blame 100%. They order the manufacture of billions of these bottles at the start of the supply chain. They can choose to funnel money into r&d, use only recyclable cans or glass but they choose plastic everytime because they claim its what the customers want. No one pushes back and the guilt is always levelled onto the consumer.

2

intenseskill t1_j3n4rct wrote

Wood ones are better to use anyway imo. The ones you get I chippies. I get two and offset the prongs making it into four

1

YeahThatPeter t1_j3nhsas wrote

The lil wood forks they have now with takeaway are better anyway

1

jannemannetjens t1_j3niceb wrote

>Like for example do people not end up piling them despite the deposit

If they're nice enough for piling up you've sold them for re-use that's also fine.

>and eventually throw them out?

Why throw a good fork out after storing it for a while? Might as well sell it back, keep using it or.... Even if you throw it out, but at home that's better than along the road... Where still someone would be more likely to pick it up of there's deposit on it.

It works kinda well from bottles to pallets to pressurised gas cylinders, I'm sure forks could fit in.

1

lostnumber08 t1_j3nilpl wrote

The French strike again! Soon everyone will be forced to replace all tableware with BREAD! They must be stopped!

2

hana_solo9 t1_j3nof2v wrote

Styrofoam cups too. I live in china usually but I’m visiting family in the US and I’m astonished by the amount of styrofoam is used. China is a whole other ballgame with single use plastic and delivery stuff.

2

DedicatedDdos t1_j3nuekj wrote

Plastic bags aren't banned here so you're fine.

Nor am I advocating a complete ban on all plastics.

Nor is this a choice between you surviving financially and the world using less plastic.

Honestly, that's a whole other discussion on its own, from the fact that pollution is becoming an increasing cost to society through climate change, illnesses and whatnot, and addressing all that costs money, not addressing it even more. To how to make that transition affordable for everyone, if we even can etc... and that's a discussion I just don't fancy delving into atm.

When buying a roll of plastic bags breaks your bank there's another issue at play, and that too needs addressing. And we can do multiple things at the same time, but it too often gets bogged down by populist nonsense.

My main point is that we only get to live for a brief while and enjoy this planet, why make it shorter by polluting? And can we at least not leave the place behind cleanly? So the next poor sod that comes along at least has fresh air to breathe and some birds and trees to look at?

1

D89raj t1_j3q1nqr wrote

Cutlery and plastic to be banned.
We are all going to be eating by hand.
Fish and chips or fried chicken dips.
It’s going to get messy as you bring it to your lips.

2

Jackandwolf t1_j3ts9c0 wrote

It’s not only about the waste and if it’s biodegradable, but the pollution fromTransportation and manufacturing. Yeah, bamboo grows quickly, but it still has to harvested, shipped, shaped, packaged, then shipped again. Just make people start carrying their own cutlery if you want to make a worthwhile difference.

1

Jackandwolf t1_j3vssea wrote

Yep. Metal utensils need to have all those things happen too, but only once. It’s the single use we need to end.

As far as the cutlery, You stop providing them, and people will bring their own. You can point out how many people didn’t wear masks, but look at how many did. And if it will affect people’s food, people will adapt quickly.

1