Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

fredandlunchbox t1_izf2iso wrote

62% specificity? That’s not great for something like cancer.

3

DragonGarlicBreath t1_izfatn2 wrote

62% sensitivity. And 89% accuracy at locating tumors they detect.

It's not ideal, but it's up from 10% and for a $50 test that's not particularly invasive? I can see it being worth it to screen for and catch cancers earlier.

9