Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

joeyboii23 t1_iz6s949 wrote

I live in Colorado where this is already a law. Generally when looking for a job if I see a very high band I immediately know that it’s going to be on the lowest end of that and it’s probably not a smart idea to apply for that job. If I see a reasonable pay band I know it’s probably for real and I should apply.

1 - 10000000 would make me immediately skip to the next job post.

93

8urnMeTwice t1_iz6x8fs wrote

I saw a Palantir ad that claimed $30k for a developer, why bother?

Many people have suggested CEO pay rose after transparency rules were enacted. If it's good enough for your boss, it's good enough for you

26

MtFuzzmore t1_iz76ual wrote

If it’s a remote position and you’re in the US then you’re not their target candidate anyway. They’re shopping for somebody in South America who will do that job for that rate.

15

Fenastus t1_iz7613c wrote

Also in Colorado the range has to be reasonable

Not sure of the specifics of that though

11

hammonjj t1_iz76de8 wrote

It has to be a “good faith estimate”. I report any job listing I see without a range. Not sure how much good it does but there are supposed to be fines for it

18

Fenastus t1_iz76tit wrote

That's all well and good, but there needs to be specific language defining what a good faith estimate is. That's far too broad and open to interpretation to actually be effective. Enforcement would be a logistical nightmare as every company would end up trying to fight it, and companies that actually meant well might get flagged as well

4

joeyboii23 t1_iz7pnhk wrote

Yeah I’m not sure what’s defined as reasonable though, because I have definitely seen jobs in range of 50k - 150k. That’s a huge difference for the same job.

5

porcelainvacation t1_iz8sfxm wrote

That’s not unusual in engineering, the $50k is entry level and the $150k is 10+ year’s experience.

2

joeyboii23 t1_izag52v wrote

Makes sense for some jobs I suppose, but if it’s like a call center you better run.

1