ramriot t1_itaz9br wrote
Reply to comment by Criticalhit_jk in Voter fraud charges dropped against Hervis Rogers, Houston man who waited hours to vote in 2020 by nosotros_road_sodium
OMG those Australians must breed like frigging rabbits to get where they are now, plus 168K seems a little small for a viable gene pool.
[Edit] This is meant to be humor
Zawn-_- t1_itb0u9o wrote
Apparently not. https://www.britannica.com/science/minimum-viable-population#ref1215147
TLDR: 50 is enough to limit inbreeding and 500 is enough to limit genetic drift (idk what that is). This is an old rule however and has since been somewhat discredited. I think. I'm not that into this, i was briefly curious.
hanniballz t1_itbblh2 wrote
our population bottlenecked to several thousand at one point in prehistory. yet we thrived afterward, so probably some truth to it.
WilliamMorris420 t1_itbj9z8 wrote
But there's less genetic diversity on the entire human race than in one troop of monkeys.
AfricanisedBeans t1_itb09cj wrote
Most settlers in Australia were free, plus there was a large amount of immigration after WW2
TruffelTroll666 t1_itbft13 wrote
Wis a silly accent from ze County zey came from?
AfricanisedBeans t1_itpodjj wrote
Yes
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments