Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ramriot t1_itaz9br wrote

OMG those Australians must breed like frigging rabbits to get where they are now, plus 168K seems a little small for a viable gene pool.

[Edit] This is meant to be humor

4

Zawn-_- t1_itb0u9o wrote

Apparently not. https://www.britannica.com/science/minimum-viable-population#ref1215147

TLDR: 50 is enough to limit inbreeding and 500 is enough to limit genetic drift (idk what that is). This is an old rule however and has since been somewhat discredited. I think. I'm not that into this, i was briefly curious.

6

hanniballz t1_itbblh2 wrote

our population bottlenecked to several thousand at one point in prehistory. yet we thrived afterward, so probably some truth to it.

3

WilliamMorris420 t1_itbj9z8 wrote

But there's less genetic diversity on the entire human race than in one troop of monkeys.

2