Submitted by je97 t3_120js00 in UpliftingNews
Vermaxx t1_jdteg52 wrote
Reply to comment by ohheyisayokay in Top lawyers defy bar to declare they will not prosecute peaceful climate protesters by je97
Let's also talk about the fact that "peaceful protest" doesn't lead to prison. Rioting and property destruction do. These attorneys are defending terrorism.
ohheyisayokay t1_jdttrrw wrote
>Let's also talk about the fact that "peaceful protest" doesn't lead to prison.
Oh my god, do you actually believe that?!
Vermaxx t1_jdtvbff wrote
Unless you're colloquially referring to "jail" as "prison," then no. Civil disobedience results in misdemeanor charges. Obstructing roadways, attacking people, using violence or property destruction are all possible avenues for FELONIES, which can lead to prison. Committing felonious acts for shock value to cause political change is one definition of terrorism.
ohheyisayokay t1_jdtxp3e wrote
Oho! You almost got me with this one. It almost looked relevant, until I remembered that prison time has fuckall to do with whether prosecutors being charges or not.
Did you lose track of the history of the conversation? We're talking about UK prosecutors refusing to prosecute for peaceful protests, and you're changing the subject to "peaceful protests don't lead to prison time."
Almost!!
Vermaxx t1_jdty76m wrote
How does someone go to prison if they're not charged with a crime? The sign says "no prison." I'd expect prosecutors to know what level of charges they're vacating and be technically precise. Ergo, they're not planning on sticking to misdemeanor charges, they plan on excusing felonies.
ohheyisayokay t1_jdujp5i wrote
What the fuck? You have to be trolling at this point. Otherwise I am alarmed by how confused you are.
Let's look at how far off you are with this stretch:
-
You apply US legal terms to UK legal matters. The UK has no misdemeanors and felonies, that distinction was legally abolished in the mid 20th century.
-
You are now taking a sign you saw in a photo of a protest and applying its text to the intentions of a wholly separate group of people: the prosecutors.
-
You pull your bizarre logic from all over the place, whether it's connected or not. Assumptions about the US legal system, assumptions about the intent of the lawyers, and extrapolations from the text of one sign at a protest.
You're reaching hard and ignoring facts in favor of your conjecture.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments