Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

AutoModerator t1_jdd9hpf wrote

Reminder: this subreddit is meant to be a place free of excessive cynicism, negativity and bitterness. Toxic attitudes are not welcome here.

All Negative comments will be removed and will possibly result in a ban.


I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

Intrepid-Astronaut41 t1_jddmu0v wrote

It's nice that they didn't pick a winning fuel. Should be interesting to see what happens.

12

Socialistics t1_jde6au3 wrote

Soooo disappointing!

Force these profit machines to use sails and solar by 2028. Watch Innovation bloom and things change in time.

"Carbon neutral by 2050", WTF is that weak ass soup?!

24

Ploobul t1_jdejxug wrote

Aren’t maritime emissions a drop in the ocean when compared to basically every other form of transit?

4

jwhoooday t1_jdg6qqy wrote

The claim was made about "pollution" from these ships. It did not even say what kind, because it would not have been as scary. It was a thought experiment which had some validity, but was questionable to say the least. Specifically it "found" that Sox and Nox pollution would be the same for the 16 ships and all the cars in the world. Not CO/ CO2. It was questionable, to say the least in 2009. Sulphur content of has been reduced significantly since then and it is certainly not the case anymore. Shipping does burn some nasty stuff and is a major polluter, no doubt. But exaggerated claims only serve to point fingers at everybody else. Obviously what we should do is kill all nuclear ambitions and just pipe oil from Russia to avoid having to ship it.

7