Submitted by Banestar66 t3_11us3me in UpliftingNews
Comments
lupuscapabilis t1_jcpqtx1 wrote
I no longer feel comfortable commenting on any "first woman" posts. Enjoy!
hippychemist t1_jcq2uoa wrote
And yet...
hippychemist t1_jcq2y6h wrote
Anyone watch the game? How'd she play?
Banestar66 OP t1_jcq40ti wrote
She only pinch hit for one plate appearance and it was a ground out to first base. Hard to take much positive or negative from it yet.
hippychemist t1_jcq6vtm wrote
Respectable enough. Glad it wasn't an intentional walk or some other "message". They let her play, and she played. I'm curious to see how it plays out.
TadpoleMajor t1_jcqbi8r wrote
It’s the first “ real” woman to do so(I’m sure there’s a better way to phrase it but I mean a woman who was born a woman and has a female body). Transgender women should be treated fair, but someone born a woman had to do A LOT to get to this point to compete against men.
hippychemist t1_jcqehez wrote
I'm not too worried about who's competing in "men's" leagues. If you're good enough, I don't care about your private parts. It's cool to see the skill gap narrowing, and I'm excited to see more of it.
The point of my reply was that "Im uncomfortable commenting" is not only a comment (making the entire statement laughably untrue), but still some half assed attempt to make a point. It's just overall a stupid thing to type.
TadpoleMajor t1_jcqeyd9 wrote
Ah, yes I see what you’re saying with regards to his comment.
And I don’t think anyone’s worrying about men’s leagues anyway, it’s more the women’s leagues that concern people.
hippychemist t1_jcqf2lf wrote
Agreed. Strange time to be alive.
r0botdevil t1_jcqfd1a wrote
The fact that she even put bat to ball against a D-1 pitcher is something, though. I'm not sure I could do that.
I'm hoping she gets at least a few more at-bats. It'll be interesting to see what she can do in the future.
Readalie t1_jcqirhv wrote
The term you're looking for is 'cis' fyi.
Banestar66 OP t1_jcqm47b wrote
I’m at the game today. I’ll let everyone know if she gets in the game what I see from her. So far I’ve just seen her warm up with the team.
Fanfics t1_jcqmm58 wrote
ok but with a last name like that she's gotta be on the mound right
Whako4 t1_jcqng4j wrote
I remember in highschool a soft ball player came to play with us in baseball. She was a cool person and good at softball but tbh didn’t translate well to baseball.
Ryaninthesky t1_jcqpkpx wrote
I was impressed she got anything on it. First at bats make you nervous enough, let alone with media covering.
picchumachu t1_jcqs9x0 wrote
Oddly enough, goes both ways. mlb players have been struck out by softball players, something to do with the distance to the mound and what your accustomed to and whatnot
Satanich t1_jcqsoz8 wrote
"you are not sure you could do that?"
Knor614 t1_jcqt6cb wrote
Why did women’s baseball die but fast pitch softball grow
jstlknatstf t1_jcqtmnr wrote
For some reason I read the last name as "pitch-hard-oh"
Psych0matt t1_jcr0cxo wrote
Is she sponsored by Bean Bay Beans?
cspinelive t1_jcr22bf wrote
Softball is on a smaller field. Pitcher is closer. Game is faster and more exciting.
I don’t know about women’s baseball though. Was it on the same field the men played on? Might have been a slower game.
Banestar66 OP t1_jcr2e77 wrote
Disappointingly did not get to see her play despite Brown being up 11-3. Got to see her warm up though and her friends in the stands were certainly cheering for her and trying to get the manager to put her in.
clem82 t1_jcr3ekl wrote
Angle at which the ball comes in as well
jsprague6 t1_jcr3mr6 wrote
That and the underhand release is really difficult to adjust to if you're used to overhand. Baseballs always have a downhill trajectory, whereas a softball can go uphill or downhill depending on the location and pitch type.
ajdani2 t1_jcr70x5 wrote
So much of it is just having to change what you’re used to. Stanford’s gymnasts have a series of funny videos of the men and women’s teams trying and failing on each other’s events.
rutinerad t1_jcr7arw wrote
Yeah, El Pichardo is The Pitcher in Spanish.
jdbway t1_jcr7i0v wrote
They're ruining men's sport!!
Lemmonjello t1_jcr7ogv wrote
I hear they are the beaniest
[deleted] t1_jcr8b6k wrote
[deleted]
novium258 t1_jcrb6vp wrote
Title IX, ironically. It allowed schools to ban girls from baseball if they offered them softball instead
Knor614 t1_jcrbutt wrote
Wow didn’t know that
Knor614 t1_jcrc2ij wrote
Seems like a smaller ball would help
Moses_Cleaveland t1_jcreoz1 wrote
Women's baseball is pretty much dead, but there are some leagues whose mission is to support it, and there was a Women's Baseball World Cup a few years ago. I think it is done every year, but I don't know any details.
cspinelive t1_jcrgfi4 wrote
Help with what? How?
alwaysmyfault t1_jcrgpqd wrote
This isn't basketball.
A smaller baseball would make it harder to hit, harder to catch, harder to throw.
Knor614 t1_jcrh030 wrote
Generally women have smaller hands so you would think that using a smaller ball would be better
Admiral_Gial_Ackbar t1_jcrhlya wrote
You put a one and two zeros in front of that comment or we walk.
cspinelive t1_jcrhz2f wrote
I’m just making stuff up here but you’ve got 8 year olds girls throwing a softball just fine. Granted it is smaller at that age but still bigger than a baseball. So I’m guessing the softball isn’t so big that it would really impact the ability to throw it.
The smaller field makes plays closer and throws shorter. Plays happen faster. The larger ball travels off the bat slower and keep more hits playable than if the ball were smaller.
nox_nox t1_jcri8s5 wrote
Women's reaction time in softball is faster (less overall time) than men's professional baseball due to the shorter distance from mound to plate.
"ESPN's Sport Science broke down the speed of both games, pointing out that a 70 mph softball pitch -- from its shorter distance -- reaches home plate faster than a 100 mph baseball pitch. That means a softball player has less than half the time (.025 seconds) to decide to swing compared to a baseball player (.055 seconds). Now imagine trying to decipher whether or not that pitch headed your way is in the strike zone or not."
Source: https://fanbuzz.com/college-sports/college-baseball/softball-vs-baseball/amp/
nox_nox t1_jcrifcu wrote
The reaction time in softball is almost half as much as baseball.
https://fanbuzz.com/college-sports/college-baseball/softball-vs-baseball/amp/
EffingBarbas t1_jcrjfps wrote
The simple solution is to allow men to compete in women’s softball. That would remove the sexism and allow the best to compete regardless of genitalia.
tjthebest t1_jcrknoy wrote
I would assume if she is a college baseball player that she hasn't really played softball though. So I don't really think this applies.
robzombie03 t1_jcrmtgq wrote
The ball is also much bigger and don't they use enlarged barrel aluminum bats?
DogsbeDogs t1_jcrmuv7 wrote
The above also doesn't discuss the size of the ball. Even if the reaction time needs to be quicker, the movement based on the reaction doesn't need to be as accurate. I think the .03 difference would be offset by the size of the ball.
robzombie03 t1_jcrnczp wrote
An issue is they are usually playing with the others rules on their own equipment. Women aren't using heavy wood bats to hit a baseball and men aren't using aluminum bats to hit a softball. You also have to change bat rotation speeds.
Worfstache t1_jcrnq08 wrote
Aluminum yes, large barrel, no.
robzombie03 t1_jcroqwk wrote
You're correct on enlarged barrel
Conflict_Main t1_jcrosx1 wrote
More exciting?!? Sure…
ryan2one3 t1_jcrox25 wrote
r/unexpectedfuturama
[deleted] t1_jcrpbhf wrote
[removed]
Lubadbitches t1_jcrpmcf wrote
Softball pants enlarge some barrels
Lubadbitches t1_jcrqt5k wrote
Worst outcomes for an at bat are as follows:
- Strike out looking
- Strike out swinging
- Hit a little dinker that the C or P picks up and throws you out 4. Ground out to 1st/2nd
So hell yea it’s a W for her. Infield pop ups can go in there somewhere too.
EverythingGoodWas t1_jcrrgn8 wrote
For all you know that comment was made by Barry Bonds. For what it’s worth I am 100% sure I could not put a baseball in play in D1 ball.
EverythingGoodWas t1_jcrrkkw wrote
What about hitting into a double play?
nox_nox t1_jcrry84 wrote
Professor baseball players have been struck out by women's softball pitchers.
[deleted] t1_jcrs1n9 wrote
[removed]
DogsbeDogs t1_jcrsel3 wrote
Okay? Baseball players get struck out playing baseball too. Your comment doesn't change anything I said about the ball size not being accounted for.
Also, I bet softball players would be struck out by baseball pitchers. So again, your comment doesn't really address anything....
I was just pointing out that "sports science" usually does a shifty job at actual science and constantly doesn't account for important factors.
TheBeautifulChaos t1_jcrusfk wrote
So she was benched the entire game?
elgatomalo1 t1_jcrv7j9 wrote
That sucks
bossmt_2 t1_jcrvyc1 wrote
Odds are women softball players would be struck out by professional baseball players. Both are hard in different ways. Both hitters rely heavily on release points and timing. Baseball hitters don't have the timing to hit softball, and vice versa. Give both of them time and they'd be able to figure each other out and adapt their swings and timing.
GimmeMyMoneyBack t1_jcrw3yb wrote
If men and women are physically equal, then what is the significance of this achievement?
[deleted] t1_jcrwgew wrote
ItsSevii t1_jcrwgzm wrote
They aren't equal.. I don't think anyone of sound mind with any basic biological understanding would disagree.
Deadfishfarm t1_jcrwil5 wrote
The coach plays the best players. If a woman can get up to the level of the top 9 players, they'll deserve playing time
bossmt_2 t1_jcrx2me wrote
The issue with this is that 70 MPH softball pitches are rare, it's much more common to face pitches in the mid 60s. Average D1 is around 64 MPH or 93.87 Feet per second meaning from a mound which from 43 feet away means you have .458 seconds until it crosses the plate. vs baseball and a 91 MPH fastball on a 60.5 foot mound you have .453 seconds until it crosses the plate. Part of the assumption is on release point etc. But time until impact is basically the same. Which is the more common issue.
GimmeMyMoneyBack t1_jcrxonp wrote
But what about gender equality? I thought women could do everything that men could do better than men could do it. I find it hard to believe that the media has been lying to me. You wouldn't be suggesting that, would you?
That kind of thinking is dangerous and misogynistic.
ItsSevii t1_jcrymcg wrote
Lol only braindeads would say anything of the sort
TheBeautifulChaos t1_jcrynw5 wrote
Okay. That wasn’t my question.
[deleted] t1_jcs34pr wrote
[removed]
hippychemist t1_jcs584a wrote
I'm basically 100% you couldn't do that.
I also couldn't do that, and I'm naturally athletic and hit airborn rocks with sticks pretty effortlessly. Still, I have no doubt that I couldn't hit a 90mph slider while under more pressure than I've ever experienced in my life by a long shot.
BullAlligator t1_jcsaham wrote
Yes, like most of the team
Lubadbitches t1_jcsbhtv wrote
Still a groundout. Just adding more variables. But yes still an emotional toll. Good thing it didn’t happen
Pincindleton t1_jcsd3au wrote
Not at all true and you know it lmao, don't act like subbing in players isn't a thing in every sport, especially for developing players in garbage time. Just say what you really mean dude.
wangyuanji58 t1_jcsdren wrote
You don't sub players in in tennis.
Pincindleton t1_jcsfdz5 wrote
Yeah I'm sure that will be their response lol. BuT wAiT ThEy DonT SuB iN PlaYeRs iN SCotTiSh FlaG waTeR RUgbY sO yOU'rE wrOnG ActUaLly.
Deadfishfarm t1_jcsjrn7 wrote
Do you play collegiate baseball? Or are you talking out of your ass?
[deleted] t1_jcskwj2 wrote
[removed]
lawfulkitten1 t1_jcsrgss wrote
it's baseball, it's normal for teams to only make a couple of subs because you can't put players back into the game after they leave. even MLB teams will carry players who only play once every few games.
Mclarenrob2 t1_jcst320 wrote
A real woman, with a womb?
Gobaxnova t1_jcsup97 wrote
As a non baseball fan this is quite funny to read. It’s like that family guy cricket sketch
LikesTheTunaHere t1_jct88lj wrote
No but I bet you could eat a slider while doing 90mph down the highway, so you do have that going for you :D
LikesTheTunaHere t1_jct8fr4 wrote
Interesting that they are using numbers that are higher than the average by a good margin for softball.
Weird.
Fairmount_Throwaway t1_jctco1p wrote
If it was men’s then why is a woman playing? Seems like you missed the boat on this one.
vescis t1_jctdbo7 wrote
We want a Pitchardo, not a belly itchardo!
whit4504 t1_jctdrod wrote
Dont let state legislatures see this
lionheart4life t1_jcte1vd wrote
The pitchers already strike out like 90% of the batters they face. There would be no scoring with a smaller ball.
Macdaddyfucboi t1_jctfz51 wrote
Watched the game, was not impressed. Next .
laceyourbootsup t1_jcthret wrote
Baseball is a sport with data that can pretty much verify your talent level.
Olivia would be a below average Division 3 baseball player.
[deleted] t1_jcttvys wrote
[deleted]
TheBeautifulChaos t1_jctx0ed wrote
Yea I understand how sports work. My question was if she was benched the entire game or not
handsomehares t1_jcu7jnd wrote
Baseball doesn’t sub as many people in, as a rule.
Imagine they had subbed her in when up so much, would it then be viewed as a stunt because she’d have no real impact on the game?
Equity only works in some situations, she’s playing for equality and equality looks like riding the bench for a lot of the players. Good enough to sit on the bench but maybe not good enough for this game right here right now in this moment.
Even if it is virtue signaling … sometimes that’s necessary just to get the narrative moving.
handsomehares t1_jcu807w wrote
The two sports are comparable by the eye test but otherwise the different dynamics of the ball make it wildly different.
Pro baseball players would struggle more against a softball pitch because they don’t train for that. Same the other way around. Doing something you’re not used to inherently means you’re not going to be as good as something you train for. It doesn’t necessarily correlate with difficulty or skill levels.
kobocha t1_jcu928g wrote
Not trying to be a dick. Just curious, why is this a big deal?
Eagle-of-the-star t1_jcuf1fb wrote
This isn’t a smartass question, but if a guy wanted to play softball could he play for the women’s teams?
Pincindleton t1_jcv043o wrote
>Imagine they had subbed her in when up so much, would it then be viewed as a stunt because she’d have no real impact on the game?
I mean yeah, that's kinda the point. That's when a lot of subs happen, and it's generally viewed as a way to develop younger talent. It's really not that much different from any other freshman bench riders on the team.
handsomehares t1_jcv1mo3 wrote
I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m saying that the same story could be spun from both directions if that’s how people want to spin it.
[deleted] t1_jcvr3ex wrote
[removed]
yavimaya22 t1_jcwxeg6 wrote
yavimaya22 t1_jcwxglw wrote
Can you pls elaborate?
yavimaya22 t1_jcwxioo wrote
I'm sure you could do way better 😂
Macdaddyfucboi t1_jcxble3 wrote
Tell that to every sports fan. I'm not interested in charity in sports. If she earned her spot she'll get criticized like all the other athletes. Don't do het a disservice by treating her different, she's just one of the guys.
GOP-are-Terrorists t1_jdbxen0 wrote
Title 9 is an ncaa rule that basically says schools have to have an equal number of women's and men's sports teams. So to legally kick women off the baseball team regardless of how good they are schools just added softball and put them there.
GOP-are-Terrorists t1_jdbxm20 wrote
You never saw A League of Their Own with Tom Hanks? It's a classic
cspinelive t1_jdff48s wrote
I’ve seen it. Great show. I don’t remember if the fields were same size or anything else that would have helped answer this question though.
GOP-are-Terrorists t1_jdlluqs wrote
Softball has different dimensions because the sport gets played a little bit differently. I'm pretty certain the old school women's baseball leagues just brought the fences in closer and that was it.
cspinelive t1_jdmm61z wrote
Found this in Wikipedia
In the first season, the league played a game that was a hybrid of baseball and softball. The ball was 12 inches in circumference, the size of a regulation softball (regulation baseballs are 9 to 91⁄4 inches). The pitcher's mound was only forty feet from home plate, closer even than in regulation softball and much closer than the baseball distance of 60 feet, 6 inches. Pitchers threw underhand windmill, like in softball, and the distance between bases was 65 feet, five feet longer than in softball, but 25 feet shorter than in baseball. Major similarities between the AAGPBL and baseball included nine player teams and the use of a pitcher's mound (softball pitchers throw from flat ground). By 1948, the ball had shrunk to 103⁄8 inches, overhand pitching was allowed, and the mound was moved back to 50 feet. Over the history of the league, the rules continued to gradually approach those of baseball. By the final season in 1954, the ball was regulation baseball size, the mound was moved back to 60 feet, and the basepaths were extended to 85 feet (still five feet shorter than in regulation baseball).
AutoModerator t1_jcpkanw wrote
Reminder: this subreddit is meant to be a place free of excessive cynicism, negativity and bitterness. Toxic attitudes are not welcome here.
All Negative comments will be removed and will possibly result in a ban.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.