Ad-for-you-17 t1_jb0bl8h wrote
FYI about 30% of the ocean protected is the minimum generally agreed by scientists to keep most of the necessary functions such as providing us food
Anxious-Telephone-69 t1_jb1hk6c wrote
And even the most minimal we will not be bothered to protect since this is non binding
dumbidoo t1_jb29w0s wrote
If 30% is literally the bare minimum required to avoid environmental collapse, it's obviously not enough. That leaves no leeway, no room for error or accidents, man-made or natural, even IF everyone actually abides by it. It's pure human hubris to also assume these calculations are 100% accurate when dealing with such complex systems or that some new factors couldn't change things. You don't park a car on the very edge of a cliff and then get to be shocked that something happened to it when you could have easily parked it at a safer distance.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments