Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ultimate_Driving t1_j9ts22b wrote

And by "low income" they actually mean "upper middle class" income.

1

AftyOfTheUK t1_j9u8k4b wrote

Well, yes. And "low income" in Denver is "Arms dealer megawealthy" in Somalia, but that's not relevant at all because... wait for it... Denver isn't Somalia

−1

Ultimate_Driving t1_j9ubeqe wrote

My point was that even if a percentage of the units built are dedicated for what they consider to be "low income," it's only families with upper middle class incomes who can afford to buy those units. They're still too expensive for people earning low incomes to afford.

2

AftyOfTheUK t1_j9umts2 wrote

I notice you edited your post to remove the Denver reference.

80% of median is not upper middle class income in the area that this article is about. It sounds like a lot of money, but it is not in those areas. Not all areas are alike. Upper middle class income would be 200k or more.

0