epelle9 t1_j7yf6cw wrote
Reply to comment by SizzlerWA in Shell’s board of directors sued over ‘flawed’ climate strategy in first-of-its-kind lawsuit | Euronews by ahivarn
You got this whole lawsuit wrong.
They aren’t suing them for hurting the environment, they are auing them for putting short term profits (which result in bonuses for the board) instead of investing in renewable energies that are now better investment for long term profits and survival of those corporations.
This isn’t about reducing profits to improve climate change, but its actually about them reducing corporate profits to worsen climate change (and improve their personal profit).
The board has a legal duty to handle the risks that come (to the company) from overuse of oil, and they failed that duty because they increased the long term risks to the company’s bottom line by overusing oil for increased bonuses.
SizzlerWA t1_j82bdgh wrote
I appreciate what you’re saying, and thanks for the analysis, I think it’s fair.
I just don’t condone doing an end run around the legal shields that corporations provide, otherwise everyday employees could be sued for their involvement in non-criminal work outcomes that people disagree with.
[deleted] t1_j85isyo wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments