Submitted by zav3rmd t3_zyv55j in Showerthoughts
For all we know it could be rainbow colored, polka dotted, checkered.
Submitted by zav3rmd t3_zyv55j in Showerthoughts
For all we know it could be rainbow colored, polka dotted, checkered.
Tried to Google it. Says that skin is rarely intact all the more the color.
Yea, true. As I say, very rare. But possible. It's also not beyond the realm of possibility that better techniques for analysing fossils we already have will grant us a better idea in the future.
Skin is rarely intact but we have examples, so we can tell what the texture of those examples was.
However you are right that currently we cannot determine the pigmentation.
We can, in fact, determine the coloration of dinosaurs , given well-preserved specimens. Most of these have been pigmentation of feathers. Microraptor had iridescent black feathers like modern crows, Anchiornis had black, white and grey feathers all over its body and a crest of dark red or ochre feathers on its head, and Sinosauropteryx had rusty orange feathers over its body and white rings on its tail. However, we have been able to discern the pigmentation of a couple of non-feathered dinosaurs. Psittacosaurus was counter-shaded (dark back, pale belly) and had stripes and spots resembling camouflage patterns seen in some modern animals such as certain deer. Borealopelta was also counter-shaded in shades of brown.
I love it when I learn something new.
Thank you!
Ah the nuance of a brain developed by the first page of google
Stupid ass
I believe we can backtrack the fossil record to get reasonable ideas, but yes, unless we clone a perfect sample or invent a time machine, certainty seems quite difficult.
I was actually thinking if we develop a warp drive and go to a place a million light years away and then look at earth using a telescope then we can see.
That's a kick ass time telescope. 😁
That’s not quite the way it works.
How so?
The telescope itself would have to be light years wide, and you wouldn’t see images. The light from 65 million years ago, but no, it wouldn’t be like watching a video.
In the UK's National Science Museum they have mummified/fossilized Dinosaur Skin, which shows us texture.
We could, I dunno, look at reptile skins of creatures that are alive today, that might give us some clues.
Valid but still. It could be anything
No, not anything - there’s a set number of real-world, current examples we can base our ideas on.
Ya but the dinosaurs are different from our current reptiles in a lot of ways. Why can't skin color be one of them.
Edit: chameleons are reptiles. So dinosaurs can have chameleon skins too?
Additionally, dinosaurs actually seem to be much closer to birds than reptiles now.
So then by that argument of "closer" it only makes more sense that dinosaur skin may be more colorful than we thought?
How about a chameleon 🦖 T-Rrex
No, it means that dinosaurs most likely have soft skin and had feathers.
I think of it more by environment. It’s unlikely that a bright orange dinosaur would be living in a rainforest, where it needs to use camouflage, for either hunting or hiding.
This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.
Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"
(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)
Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
But seriously check out the Dino mummy. It’s an extremely fascinating paleontological discovery.
Everything was black n white until my parents were 30 idk what you’re talking about
[removed]
AxialGem t1_j280eb6 wrote
I think there is, right? We have skin impressions, and pigment can in fact be preserved, like in feather fossils we have. It's rare for sure, because it requires excellent preservation, but there are absolutely ways we can know
See also: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur_coloration