Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Toasterstyle70 t1_j2aq8ca wrote

That’s my theory on why movies made from books are often regarded as “not as good as the book”. Partially because movies leave some things out, but I feel like it’s mostly because reality of the movie is no match for your personalized imagination of the story.

513

kheret t1_j2bv8um wrote

LOTR was, for me, a big exception to this. I read the books well before the films came out. Tolkien was so rich with his descriptions that while things were not the same as in my head they were, like, close enough.

105

visionarydonut t1_j2bzxpg wrote

I think this is also the case with manga and anime. I often see people complain that a manga did a certain scene better than its anime. Many times when I check them side by side, the anime scene looks exactly the same, except with extra movement.

I figure that the issue is that they imagined a certain tone of voice and movement in the manga and are disappointed when it doesn't happen like that in the anime.

97

JustinJakeAshton t1_j2cu30r wrote

Animation absolutely screws with frame details, especially when movement is involved. Add the effect of coloring and you can easily have a bunch of scenes that look better in manga form.

38

PrecipitousPlatypus t1_j2cru5u wrote

Depends quite heavily on the specific case. With a sufficient budget and good direction, an anime adaptation will usually be just as good as a manga, like when you look at current popular ones like Kaguya Sama and Chainsaw Man.

11

Printnamehere3 t1_j2dhwqq wrote

My dad always said, "A book lets your imagination run wild and a movie forces you down one path."

11

Toasterstyle70 t1_j2dz5qf wrote

I know this is off topic, but the same thing goes for time going faster as you get older. When your 1, your whole perspective of a lifetime is 1 year. When your 2, you’re whole perspective on time is double what you experienced the first year. By the time your 30, that one year seems very short, since you have a broader understanding of your perspective of time.

6

Vladi_Sanovavich t1_j2dn0vh wrote

Nah it's more because of cutting out details that sometimes makes the movie a whole lot different.

cough Percy Jackson cough

3

SmallpoxTurtleFred t1_j2alpov wrote

Not if they saw the movie first. Millions of people have one memory of Lord of the Rings from the movie. They will see that when they read the novel.

229

oldmanshoutinatcloud t1_j2arxi7 wrote

Unless there's a character like Tom Bombadil that doesn't appear in the movies.

52

User_Neq t1_j2bizzc wrote

Such an important missed opportunity/obligation

9

bill_gonorrhea t1_j2d9ncr wrote

I actually think he was a rabbit while they creatively avoided.

2

UndendingGloom t1_j2e089j wrote

I'm listening to the audiobook by Andy Serkis, I still imagine movie frodo in scenes with Tom bombadil even though he is being voiced essentially by gollum. So weird.

1

BaronVonBearenstein t1_j2atgey wrote

Even having read the books before seeing the movies I find if I reread the books all the imagery is that of the movie now

17

QJ0k3r t1_j2bqlkb wrote

Actually not for me. I watched Interview with a vampire before reading the books and the way Anne Rice describes the characters in the books drew a totally different image for me

6

dubiago t1_j2brzuc wrote

Can confirm. I watched the first season of The Expanse before starting to read the novels...I already had the characters' appearance neatly laid out for me. Same with Harry Potter--saw the movies first. The books, however, were absolutely superior to the films.

3

jumpsteadeh t1_j2chv83 wrote

I felt dumb when I realized a few movies into Harry Potter that I wasn't reading the actors as getting older between books. The Harry Potter I read in Order of the Pheonix looked like Daniel Radcliffe in 1999.

3

EN3RGIX t1_j2csht3 wrote

This is very true. I recently read The Martian by Andy Weir and the whole time I visualized Matt Damon.

3

Sercotani t1_j2d10q4 wrote

me when I dived into the ASOIAF novels after finishing Season 5 of AGOT. Reading the wiki and seeing the book version of the characters drawn was quite a shock to me.

1

Sunblast1andOnly t1_j2e5go7 wrote

This was my thinking as well, though the example I had in mind was The Witcher after having seen the games.

1

sociallyvicarious t1_j2bnkf4 wrote

STOP with the movie stuff!! They are NOT the same as the books! If you read the book, you determine the features and such in your mind. When you watch the movie, that determination is no longer your own. Books and movies of books should be mutually exclusive.

−6

deicist t1_j2aqqc9 wrote

I have Aphantasia, I have no idea what characters / scenes in books 'look' like.

154

dgz345 t1_j2b5na7 wrote

Same. Random question do you usually listen to music? While working or gaming?

And can you hear voices in your head? (have inner monologues)

35

SeanBrax t1_j2c0q4a wrote

Inner monologues aren’t specific to people with Aphantasia btw, I have them all the time.

19

Billybobjimjoejeffjr t1_j2bjq14 wrote

I also have aphantasia. I usually do listen to music while gaming if i get tired of the games music (usually when playing roguelikes). I also listen to music while doing pretty much anything i dont like doing to entertain myself.

Also i got an inner monologue.

12

dgz345 t1_j2ctcok wrote

Ok so I do not have inner monologues. Its quiet all the time for me on the head. Me myself I can't really lisen to music while playing games because I can't concentrate then.

I guess it's not connected with aphantasia.

5

Billybobjimjoejeffjr t1_j2cxr1x wrote

Yeah people with and without aphantasia can have a quiet mind or a inner monologue.

When youre really focused thinking about something do you think in words then? or is it some kind of other thought process? Ive heard people usually think in images when they dont have an inner monologue but i guess that wouldn't be how you do it.

5

dgz345 t1_j2d6axm wrote

I "speak" the words with closed mouth when I think. I think. It feels like the muscles in my throat is moving sightly when I think. So when I'm thinking I'm speaking for myself kinda. It's hard for me to think stuff if I'm trying to not move my muscles in the throat kinda.

3

Billybobjimjoejeffjr t1_j2db6le wrote

Thats interesting. I do that sometimes when im thinking about talking. When I get too focused on it i'll start mouthing and making facial expressions.

1

nightsky77 t1_j2d3vbe wrote

I wrote an essay about this based on this research:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34721222/

Your condition is called anauralia. I looked it up because I’m aphantasic and just talk to myself all the time.

2

dgz345 t1_j2d6wzy wrote

Interesting I'll read the full text soon. I hate reading :) but I read the abstract. I'm shit at short term memory I think but my longterm memory is kinda good I would say. I don't really listen to music and I don't plan stuff but my logic thinking is considered great. I've always had an easy time for maths and patten recognition.

3

deicist t1_j2cxaal wrote

I listen to music while driving but that's about it, I work in silence.

I don't have an internal monologue, and I don't vocalise while reading.

3

MCatsRCool t1_j2d9o1p wrote

i have aphantasia, i listen to music while gaming and i have an inner monologue

3

Wanderervenom t1_j2b4olf wrote

I didn't know there was a term for this. I don't picture the characters neither, I just live in a world of words when I read. I don't picture anything, yet I greatly enjoy what I read anyhow. Upon reading the description, I don't have aphanasia. I can imagine things if I wish. I can picture a horse's face in my head. I just don't picture anything while reading.

18

12soea t1_j2c1wfi wrote

Rotate a cow

7

jumpsteadeh t1_j2ci01m wrote

Did my brain invent a cow or am I remembering a cow I saw elsewhere?

10

MJLDat t1_j2djzjq wrote

For me it’s the Twister cow, always is.

5

jumpsteadeh t1_j2e5fop wrote

Man, there was an internet video where a lady is freaked out by a horse sticking its head in the car window, saying "oh no, a cow", and she gets so scared, then turns around and there's another horse in the other car window that makes her scream - but I can never find it again.

2

BeefyIrishman t1_j2d1gzg wrote

I don't have aphantasia, but rather a fairly active mind (likely due at least partially to my ADHD), and I just want to thank you for getting the image of a cow floating 3 feet above the ground slowly rotating in circles stuck in my head. That's what is going to be stuck in my head as I'm trying to fall asleep.

6

Slimeredit t1_j2c9ou4 wrote

I can get like a vague barely visible imprint of rotation but that’s about it

5

12soea t1_j2c9y0p wrote

I’m sorry for your loss

3

Slimeredit t1_j2cayak wrote

I’m going to be honest I’ve always just pictured things less as pictures and more of motion lines in my head like lines of flying and other stuff

2

Wanderervenom t1_j2c2emn wrote

O.K. Fades in and out. Keeps turning into a cartoon pic.

3

Kumquatelvis t1_j2ckiv5 wrote

Same boat. I have to check the cover art to know what the characters look like. Was easier in the 80’s when fantasy book usually showed the main characters in a heroic pose.

1

ven_zr t1_j2cyod7 wrote

I'm very interested in this term for a few years now. I have a 3D brain (near full control over my visual cortex while awake) so it's a bit difficult to comprehend. Question. When you recall a memory. Say like a movie scene or an action you just did from a few seconds ago. How is like in your thoughts process?

I not only can recall a memory but I have so many spatial references that I can set up "cameras" and change the camera scenes pov for my entertainment. It does have flaws. As sometimes my imagination overlap the actual observations leading into dyslexia.

0

AttentionSpanZero t1_j2dhtq0 wrote

It's hard to describe what memories are like to people who don't have aphantasia. I remember things, but I don't visualize them. It's like knowing how many coins are on a table and the denominations but they are covered with a black cloth. All I "see" is the cloth, but I recall that I did see something before they were covered. I can't "see" a scene over again. I also only recall specific details if I noted them the first time. I recognize someone I know, but don't ask me to describe them in detail. You'll get very generic feedback.

4

ThrowJed t1_j2djfh0 wrote

Yeah it's almost like you remember the concept of the thing rather than the thing itself.

2

ven_zr t1_j2dm0an wrote

That's the best explanation I heard yet. Its amazing how that is opposite on how I comprehend. I have to "see" it to grasp the concepts of meanings. Example if reading a sentence doesn't translate to visually, the words are meaningless and might as well be a foreign language.

My wife recently found out this term amphatasia but wasn't ever able to explain it well with me.

I wonder. Do you "see" dreams?

Edit: Oh another question! I have issues remember names or remember sentences Ive read but yet I can even remember minor details on faces. Is it the opposite with you?

0

AttentionSpanZero t1_j2dsez1 wrote

I do have dreams that are visual, but they are quite vague and I have a hard time remembering what I dreamt once I wake up. I don't think I've ever had a vivid dream, but they do vary a bit in detail. Oddly enough, I'll sometimes know someone in my dream but they are often portrayed by an actor I might have seen more recently on television. At least I'll feel like it's that actor since I can't see them very well. But I have no visualization at all while I'm awake.

I remember concepts from what I have read very well, but not exact sentences. I'm also bad with names. I'm actually very good at remembering faces, but only on seeing them directly. I don't know which details make them familiar, just that I recognize them. So I'll often recognize someone I met only once before if I see them in person. But I won't usually remember their name.

3

DragoKnight589 t1_j2bam76 wrote

I often imagine some scenes from books as similar to certain places I know. A random neighborhood might be like my neighborhood, and I might imagine the layout of a character’s house as similar to my own.

44

wisplike t1_j2bojx2 wrote

never have i seen such a relatable comment

7

sedrech818 t1_j2d7ler wrote

I did that a lot as a kid. Not so much nowadays. Most of the places I go are pretty boring.

1

MS822 t1_j2atk83 wrote

It's the best part! My mind's version of "Jurassic Park" would've never made it past the censorship board 🦖

26

laaldiggaj t1_j2awztq wrote

That's why books to films can be tricky. You have to make thousands of people happy.

13

Addedinterest t1_j2bjhno wrote

Not if the face is blurry. I'm sure a lot of us imagine blurry faces.

11

strajer1 t1_j2c41nn wrote

I work in advertising and this is the analogy I use when preparing a client for a creative project- that you have to decide whose vision you’re creating (typically businesses have many stakeholders in creative decisions). Every person will have a different vision of the outcome despite the same inputs and parameters. So similar to a movie- only the director will think “this is exactly what I envisioned”, everyone else will find that elements are “off” from what they imagined. But it’s impossible to realize everyone’s vision - whether you’re making a movie or any creative project.

8

ven_zr t1_j2czosp wrote

Not only images but audios like the characters voices. It's easy to place accents when characters are from an actual place on earth. Like London or southern Tennessee. But why in fantasy adaptations have to go with the UK accents. My dwarves sound like Cajun swamp dwellers and somewhat of the miner accents from the 1950s. My elves sound like noble farmers from the Midwest. My humans vary. Orcs sounds like gorillas with smokers lungs. The list goes on and on.

Hollywood fix your shit.

7

Human_2468 t1_j2bpxan wrote

And those will change if you reread the book at a different time/place in your life.

6

tkdyo t1_j2cjstb wrote

When I read GOT I didn't have faces, I just kind of imagined every character in that 1800s style where they have all of their clothes but just an outline of their face. I guess my mind just didn't know what to put there. So thanks HBO for giving my characters faces.

5

Dragon_Slayer_359 t1_j2bum89 wrote

One word: graphic novels

P.S. I'm being stupid for the funny factor. Don't think I'm serious.

4

Naggitynat t1_j2cxfdn wrote

Doing this with the book called Son of Achilles. I keep picturing Brad Pitt from Troy as Achilles’s character.

3

Jada_the_dork t1_j2cxvi2 wrote

wrong my specific imagining of the character is exactly what they look like even if it goes against the description

3

apathiest58 t1_j2bh0m8 wrote

I've seen several movies and shows where I hated an actor's voice because I was so different from the sound in my head. More so once I realized I couldn't remember the original "voice" I had.

2

skunk_ink t1_j2bteku wrote

I remember reading a study on this and they found most people imagine the characters to be remarkably similar. It really isn't that surprising to me either. Books can be quite descriptive of a characters physical features. So as long as the writing is detailed enough, readers should have some what similar image in their head of what characters look like. I'm currently unable to find the study again, but will update if I do.

Now as for the scenery you are probably correct. It's a lot harder to describe every detail of a scene.

2

Tha_Watcher t1_j2c9f6v wrote

This explains why most book to screen adaptations rarely appease or satisfy their reading audience.

2

Eborys t1_j2cac15 wrote

Hmm, try reading a Star Wars novel. My brain refuses to recast Han Solo….. even though fucking Disney did.

2

Cheshireyan t1_j2dnr3y wrote

And then we will watch the movie adaptation and all this will be over....

2

Showerthoughts_Mod t1_j2ajhvl wrote

This is a friendly reminder to read our rules.

Remember, /r/Showerthoughts is for showerthoughts, not "thoughts had in the shower!"

(For an explanation of what a "showerthought" is, please read this page.)

Rule-breaking posts may result in bans.

1

OkPenis-ist28 t1_j2b66b6 wrote

That's why books are better than the movie - YOUR imagination at play.

1

Longjohnthepirate t1_j2b7ac8 wrote

I am always so disappointed by any movie where I have read the book of first. They never get the faces right!!

1

HelldiverL17L6363 t1_j2bq8ef wrote

Yes!! That’s why I get so nervous when a book I love becomes a movies bc I’m so scared it will mess up my mental image of everyone!

1

franklygoingtobed t1_j2bqwi7 wrote

I read “characters and scents” and was “yeah, that makes sense”

1

JoyfulExmo t1_j2buf9f wrote

I hate it when I see a movie of a novel before reading the novel and the movie casting forever overrides how I picture the characters.z

1

Wildjay7931 t1_j2bzqda wrote

Likely. However, seeing as there is no way to definitely show the imagined image of the characters by the readers without outside influence, and impossible to definitely record all interpretations, this is indefinite. Although unlikely, it is possible for the imagined appearance of a character be the same for two separate readers.

1

BBGunner96 t1_j2c012n wrote

(besides the watching a movie then reading point many have pointed out) There are plenty of novels that have pictures, some of which are the characters (typically I've seen these portraits as chapter headers)

1

EnderTheThird3 t1_j2c49vh wrote

Not true. Every single person who read Jack Reacher pictured Tom Cruise in their mind... right...?

/s

1

howuprick t1_j2cmalx wrote

I realised this from how many different interpretations there are of Harry potter and lotr

1

JacktheRipper500 t1_j2csjp6 wrote

Even after seeing the movies first, when I read The Hobbit I had different images in my head regarding the appearances of characters and locations.

1

Pedantichrist t1_j2ctk6m wrote

Nope. I have aphantasia. I have no image at all. Bilbo is just the word Bilbo.

1

Andythompson78 t1_j2cu1m9 wrote

That's the appeal of a book, it stretches your imagination. Example take a Bond book, the lead character could be any body, even any gender but the films have typecast the lead to being a white English male.

1

D3monVolt t1_j2cvch2 wrote

And a movie adaptation throws things under the bus. I love the percy Jackson books but the movies are just bad. I wad excited when a "truly faithful" series adaptation was announced by Disney but their casting is incorrect. The characters have detailed descriptions and Disney disregards that. Why even bother?

But with harry potter I had the opposite experience. Never read the books but I like the movies

1

Just_OneReason t1_j2d0mhq wrote

I always picture houses stitched together from different rooms I’ve seen in my life. Might be my cousins entryway, my sisters bedroom, my grandma’s basement, my bathroom

1

Hendy853 t1_j2d0zhe wrote

This is the reason I never enjoyed Peter Dinklage’s portrayal of Tyrion Lannister as much as most people. He did an an objectively fantastic job. But he moves, looks, and especially sounds much different than what I see and hear in my head when I read the books

1

TreeRol t1_j2d14m4 wrote

I've just started reading A Song of Ice and Fire. I haven't seen the show, but I also haven't been living under a rock. It's really weird to have very distinct pictures of the characters in my head, especially when they diverge from the descriptions in the text.

1

-Redstoneboi- t1_j2d347c wrote

this is less of a showerthought and more of the usual argument for books over movies and adaptations

1

mayneffs t1_j2d6shc wrote

I always thought Pantalaimon from The Golden Compass was a lizard. I even got a stuffed toy lizard that I named Pantalaimon.

1

sedrech818 t1_j2d7bf0 wrote

That’s the great thing about books. All you have to do is tell the reader a little bit and they will fill in the blanks. I find it interesting that a character that is supposed to be beautiful in a book will always be perceived as beautiful because each reader has their own personal image of the character. Each person has their own preferences that visual arts can’t always match.

1

AlwaysAngryAndy t1_j2dcb5a wrote

I was really disappointed by Captain Underpants’ voice when I was a kid. Wasn’t what I imagined at all.

1

ilikemoots t1_j2dfwhb wrote

Yep. I read the lord of the rings multiple times before I saw the movies.

The orcs were the biggest disappointment. I just pictured them to be waaaaaay tougher looking.

1

canuck47 t1_j2dg51w wrote

Many years ago I had just finished reading "The Firm" and about a week later they announced there would be a movie version starring Tom Cruise.

I was definitely not picturing Tom Cruise in my head while I was reading it.

1

EchoTab t1_j2dijlp wrote

Except those with aphantasia who cant picture things in their head

1

OfficerGenious t1_j2dx3lc wrote

Can I cross post this to r/writers? I think we'd dig this discussion.

1

Sea-Network t1_j2e4cdi wrote

We also see ourselves 3 different ways. How we see ourselves, how we think others see us, how others really see us.

1

seanodea t1_j2eduat wrote

This is what people do in life too. Ppls view of you is but one of all the yous people may perceive. None is the correct one.

1

No_Author_8802 t1_j2eq6ql wrote

True I can hardly picture characters until I watch a movie version.

1

hatiehaze t1_j2eu22t wrote

I've read books a second time years later not realizing it because of this! Throws me off.

1

Cabbage_Corp_ t1_j2ezaa6 wrote

The most annoying part is that everyone has a different take on the names. So if you try to discuss a book, then everyone is pronouncing their names differently.

1

Weary_Jaguar_3189 t1_j2f2xuo wrote

I agree. The Tolkien estate had it written in its contract with Jackson to do the movies (the entire quadrology - The Hobbit and LOTR) as true to the books as possible, to which he did an excellent job.

I watched 'Fellowship' with my daughter and her mother (my ex-wife) and through the first half it I was commenting "He got it right" so much that both she and her mom kept telling me to shut up!

1

LordZahlen t1_j2f5u0c wrote

As someone who listen to a podcast about Harry Potter and a guy who never read them as a kid, "Potterless" has made rethink a shit loads of characters and scenes in a new light..

1