Submitted by [deleted] t3_1266kyi in Showerthoughts
SIMPSONBORT t1_je7wz0z wrote
Reply to comment by 339jimmyr in The moon has seen everything that’s ever happened to mankind/womankind by [deleted]
I thought because just mankind I’d have someone else say “ hey why didn’t u say womankind “
Seems like Better to say it then not I guess ?
BurnOutBrighter6 t1_je7x5l5 wrote
"humanity"
mirsab17 t1_je84u4v wrote
Huwomanity
MicrosoftContin t1_je8ogz8 wrote
Huwowomanity. Oh no, the recursion.
kirjavva t1_je7xcye wrote
Well, mankind already refers to Homo sapiens, but sure, there's always someone to take the "man" out of it...
The_Quibbler t1_je852i9 wrote
The etymological root of "woman" is wife of man, so tripping over ourselves in the name of sensitivity isn't really accomplishing anything here. See also: person.
I quibble.
Megalocerus t1_je803r0 wrote
But it was closer when there were dinosaurs. It had a better view!
khamelean t1_je86ka5 wrote
Mankind: human beings considered collectively; the human race:
It’s perfectly acceptable to use “mankind” to refer all humans.
mortimus9 t1_je8ejpi wrote
Okay but why is it a problem to use womankind?
Sufficient_Result558 t1_je8m72u wrote
Because it’s a different word with a different meaning.
khamelean t1_je8p1rg wrote
Though the may sound similar, they have different etymology and different meaning.
attathathappaend t1_jegrb2m wrote
Not a problem but it’s similar to that guy saying Amen and Awomen
Upper_Initial7918 t1_je8c6ma wrote
The meaning of mankind: "human beings considered collectively; the human race."
Anyone who argues against it, feminist or not, is an idiot.
sonofareptile t1_je9mdmi wrote
Mankind doesn't mean males.
attathathappaend t1_jegr5wh wrote
The word ‘man’ can be used for all humans, which is why we have words like mankind and not womankind
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments