Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

yamaha2000us t1_ja9egqm wrote

I gave you sources that challenged your sources.

It's actually how I learned to Cope.

The extra was a gift. There have been quite a few studies about that additional information. Its impact of a dual income family was huge to the economy. It has nothing to do with the Boomers. But its more comfortable to throw the buzzword on the table.

1940's economy. 1 income all classes of workers in the same boat.

1960's economy. 1 income all classes of workers in the same boat. Creation of the Educated Middle class.

1970's economy. 2 incomes people are able to purchase more.

1980's economy. 2 incomes people are able to purchase more.

1990's economy. 2 incomes people are able to purchase more. Younger generations creating bidding war and creating property ladders. Non-educated class removed from the American dream. Educated Class is OK.

2000's economy. All generations working. Younger generations still creating bidding war and creating property ladders. Boomers are out. Non-Educated Lower class are ignored by the Educated Class.

Now... The educated class can't get past what all of the prior generations have done since the 1970's.

Coping is a mechanism all generations must learn.

0

KungThulhu t1_ja9f3sw wrote

>I gave you sources that challenged your sources.

No you gave me a link to an opinion piece while i gave you links to hard data that cant be argued with. You simply cant admit youre wrong so you try to chnage the subject but i dont care for that.

2

yamaha2000us t1_ja9pkdf wrote

Just because your links support you position does not make them any more or less qualified than mine.

I don’t have to admit that I am wrong when I have proof of my position. You have to refute my sources.

0

KungThulhu t1_ja9pxpu wrote

they are data provided by the government idiot. your "source" is an opinionwritten by someone with noe experience or qualifications abotu the topic.

1

yamaha2000us t1_ja9qphj wrote

Only the last one quotes a US government source and it doesn’t go back to the 40’s which is less than the scope that I am addressing.

Which means I have hit a nerve as you are now throwing insults in the conversation as opposed to refuting my sources or responding to my challenge of yours.

0

KungThulhu t1_ja9r5mj wrote

im insulting you because youre a fucking dumbass and the conversation was over the moment i gave you sources and you just didnt accept them.

1

yamaha2000us t1_jaa4yc5 wrote

But I provided sources and don’t feel the need to be insulting.

It’s like you fire all of your bullets and missed the target every time.

1