KungThulhu t1_ja9bhff wrote
Reply to comment by yamaha2000us in Young generations tend to judge or pity for old generations but the fact is that the later are apparently happier, less anxious and more content with what they achieved or failed to. by red-ed
All youre saying is a major cope. i gave you the sources and you talk about something different.
yamaha2000us t1_ja9egqm wrote
I gave you sources that challenged your sources.
It's actually how I learned to Cope.
The extra was a gift. There have been quite a few studies about that additional information. Its impact of a dual income family was huge to the economy. It has nothing to do with the Boomers. But its more comfortable to throw the buzzword on the table.
1940's economy. 1 income all classes of workers in the same boat.
1960's economy. 1 income all classes of workers in the same boat. Creation of the Educated Middle class.
1970's economy. 2 incomes people are able to purchase more.
1980's economy. 2 incomes people are able to purchase more.
1990's economy. 2 incomes people are able to purchase more. Younger generations creating bidding war and creating property ladders. Non-educated class removed from the American dream. Educated Class is OK.
2000's economy. All generations working. Younger generations still creating bidding war and creating property ladders. Boomers are out. Non-Educated Lower class are ignored by the Educated Class.
Now... The educated class can't get past what all of the prior generations have done since the 1970's.
Coping is a mechanism all generations must learn.
KungThulhu t1_ja9f3sw wrote
>I gave you sources that challenged your sources.
No you gave me a link to an opinion piece while i gave you links to hard data that cant be argued with. You simply cant admit youre wrong so you try to chnage the subject but i dont care for that.
yamaha2000us t1_ja9pkdf wrote
Just because your links support you position does not make them any more or less qualified than mine.
I don’t have to admit that I am wrong when I have proof of my position. You have to refute my sources.
KungThulhu t1_ja9pxpu wrote
they are data provided by the government idiot. your "source" is an opinionwritten by someone with noe experience or qualifications abotu the topic.
yamaha2000us t1_ja9qphj wrote
Only the last one quotes a US government source and it doesn’t go back to the 40’s which is less than the scope that I am addressing.
Which means I have hit a nerve as you are now throwing insults in the conversation as opposed to refuting my sources or responding to my challenge of yours.
KungThulhu t1_ja9r5mj wrote
im insulting you because youre a fucking dumbass and the conversation was over the moment i gave you sources and you just didnt accept them.
yamaha2000us t1_jaa4yc5 wrote
But I provided sources and don’t feel the need to be insulting.
It’s like you fire all of your bullets and missed the target every time.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments