Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

glennjersey t1_ixw24im wrote

Reply to comment by Status_Silver_5114 in Non-Political RI Gun Law Question by provendumb

Thats literally one of the main points if the current lawsuit against the state.

OP is being deprived of his legally owned property because of a likely unconstitutional law they passed.

10

Guyincognito4269 t1_ixw7ufx wrote

Who's taking it? He still has it. My car can go over 100 mph, am I legally being deprived of it because I can't go that fast? Get a 10 rounder and go on with your life.

−20

glennjersey t1_ixw91hw wrote

That's the point. He can't get a 10 rounder.

Not every firearm has 10 round mags available.

Further - without the magazine the firearm is operable useless. Many of them won't even fire without a magazine inserted (as a safety feature). So your car analogy is more apt if you said someone was taking the gas tank out of your car. Sure they're not taking your car, but they're rendering it pretty useless, no?

8

Guyincognito4269 t1_ixw94ki wrote

What kind of weapon is it?

−11

glennjersey t1_ixw9o8c wrote

OP has not said, other than;

>I cannot order a 10 or less capacity magazine for this firearm as they are not made

One of the young senators made mention of a similar situation during the joke that was the hearings before they passed the law. This is not going to be an uncommon occurrence.

8

provendumb OP t1_ixwf8id wrote

Pistol

7

Dopey-NipNips t1_ixwr5wj wrote

But you won't say what kind because you'll get 50 links showing how easy compliance with the law is

−6

sailri t1_ixz1j34 wrote

Yes you are. Because in your scenario your engine is capable of pushing your (over $10,000?) car over the speed limit. And having it in your car in your possession would make you a felon.

3

sailri t1_ixz1td6 wrote

You could just get rid of the engine of course. Isn’t that free? Sure it is. But the cost to replace the engine? And if you can’t the cost to replace the car? That’s taking.

3