Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Swamp_yankee_ninja OP t1_iydha70 wrote

Well, if you don’t see anything wrong than that’s fine.

−1

bluehat9 t1_iydhzbz wrote

Can you just explain the money part?

8

Swamp_yankee_ninja OP t1_iydi8aa wrote

It’s simple, the DBR doesn’t want to penalize these business right before the rollout of over the counter recreational cannabis. That would cut into the States profits.

8

Dapper_Chapper t1_iydjbms wrote

10/10 Q&A right here. No one blew up, and though we can see the cracks of differences in perspective, the bois stayed on the point. Cheers to that.

6

bluehat9 t1_iye1t15 wrote

They destroyed the products that failed the tests, what other punishment would there be?

5

Swamp_yankee_ninja OP t1_iye5eqr wrote

Well, if they where found to be willfully and knowingly using banned pesticides and or herbicides? I would expect a fine at the very least.

3

bluehat9 t1_iye75km wrote

That makes sense, but does simply testing positive for banned substances reach an acceptable burden of proof of willfully and knowingly using them? I think this is the dbr saying “this is your one chance to correct the problem”. It does seem that the dbr has the power to levy such a fine, so hopefully if there is good reason, they will do so.

1

Swamp_yankee_ninja OP t1_iyeb2eb wrote

Well, they have cameras at every cultivation center and RIDBR has access to them 24/7. So I suppose they could look for evidence of pesticide spraying. I don’t know if the RI law or DBR rules even have a provision for fines in this case. This of course is likely the last time they would be able to get away with it. Unless of course a grower made a financial contribution to the testing company.

2

bluehat9 t1_iyectzm wrote

Anything’s possible. I just don’t think we should assume the worst all the time.

0