Submitted by MadLove1348 t3_yx1qh0 in RhodeIsland

Does anyone know why they changed the exits on 95? I think now they match up to the mile marker, but what exactly is the point of this or reason they wanted to change it?

14

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

RenoSinNombre t1_iwmcr61 wrote

It's a federal mandate, and they can lose funding if the don't comply.

110

FAYCSB t1_iwmexl6 wrote

If you’re not familiar with the area, exit numbers that indicate miles give you a lot more information than just an ordinal.

45

Rickshmitt t1_iwmmnf7 wrote

It does make sense. Gonna be annoying for a few years. Exit 25 old exit 3

12

degggendorf t1_iwmmynv wrote

With the one exception being if you add an exit within the same mile as another, then you need to add letters.

But that's also what they did before, like exits 6 and 6a (now 18 and 19).

7

LateToSapphos t1_iwmn47y wrote

They needed an easy way to launder money through the state again

−32

Proof-Variation7005 t1_iwmpr43 wrote

The part that irritates me about the federal rule is that it was made in 2009 when smartphone ownership was like 15% in America and even those people had to pay extra for GPS capability, but it is pretty hard to not see where that technology was heading.

The scalability of exits makes total sense. This idea that now people know how far until their exit is just federal officials doing a remarkably terrible job at reading the room a little.

12

shadowcaster11 t1_iwmtz76 wrote

Signs are union made and union installed. There was no reason to change them

−27

RedditSkippy t1_iwmvxj0 wrote

It’s a Federal law. New England dragged its feet on complying.

20

geffe71 t1_iwn12yc wrote

Federal mandate. Easier to call in an exit number based on mile marker in an emergency

Also, if they were to add exits, they don’t need to fuck with the existing exit numbers

Example: Old exit 15 and 16 are miles apart, now they are exits 37 and 47. If they add an exit its based on miles so it could be exit 42 instead of fucking with the lower numbers

20

Proof-Variation7005 t1_iwna7v3 wrote

>A GPS still doesn't tell you how many miles you've been in a state nor how many miles until the next exit.

True. The 2nd part is helpful. Unless you've got a special song or celebration for being 69 miles into a state, I don't see why anyone would need to know the first part.

2

darthduder666 t1_iwnc2g6 wrote

Dude Exit 1 here too. Our exit falls around 0.4 miles. So technically our exit should be Exit 0 if they’re following the rounding rules. 😂

I was hoping they’d make it Exit 0 because that would just be badass.

7

overthehillhat t1_iwnee0v wrote

always think of the route # or the street name of each exit -

That hasn't changed since their inception-

1

Firebird22x t1_iwngi61 wrote

This way makes more sense in the long run, it’s easier math.

If there’s no traffic and I’m at exit 4, and I need to get off exit 28, I’m driving 24 miles.

As long as I’m driving around 60, which most people do, you’ll get to that exit in about 24 minutes

16

Firebird22x t1_iwnhkoc wrote

Growing up in Jersey that was a main way of knowing where someone was from if you’re in another area.

You’re from Linden? I’m not sure where that is. Oh exit 136 off the Parkway? That’s only like 15 miles from me, yeah we should meet up some time

2

Firebird22x t1_iwnk97t wrote

Hah I could take this both ways. Rush hour definitely less. Normal day, sure south of EG you’re doing 75-80, but I’d say it averages out.

Driving from my mother in law’s in Westerly to Cranston when we lived there it was a pretty consistent 45 minutes. 10 on backroads, 30-35 highway (which is right in line with 31 to 33 for the Cranston exit now)

1

__CarCat__ t1_iwnlpnw wrote

Looking at your GPS is not only an often annoyingly inaccurate but also very dangerous thing, why would the federal rule encourage phone usage over reading the signs they spend so much money on? Not every issue has a tech solution. A sign for exit 4 will always tell me "ok I'm 20 miles from exit 24" instead of wondering and looking through my phone.

4

lazydictionary t1_iwnm3xk wrote

I've lived in Colorado, Texas, and upstate NY - I've never used exit numbers unless it was a road trip.

I don't understand why locals would complain about exit numbers. There are people out there who really memorized "I take exit 6" and if they don't they'll miss their turn?

0

Firebird22x t1_iwnm6yd wrote

Assuming it’s from planes trains and automobiles (at least that’s what came up), I haven’t seen that yet unfortunately.

I have seen clips that were pretty good, I probably should give it a watch

1

Proof-Variation7005 t1_iwnoso5 wrote

Idk what to tell ya about the inaccuracy beyond that you might be due for a phone and/or cell carrier upgrade.

As for looking at the phone? If a person needs to do that, we're talking 1-2 seconds maximum to be able to see it. Probably less if it's just "see how long before their exit is"

Most people would just relying on the lady telling you this information as needing to even see the phone.

Not to mention that for most modern cars, you don't even need to have a phone to have a functioning GPS. It's a rpetty common feature that's going to be more common than having a traditional radio within a decade of now.

​

>Not every issue has a tech solution.

Except for every solved problem is the entire history of humanity, sure.

0

6ixg0ddess t1_iwnrjcq wrote

You answered yourself. They did it so the exit numbers match up with the corresponding mile marker .. and to spend our tax dollars on irrelevant things.

−2

KennyWuKanYuen t1_iwnsxg9 wrote

So I’m not alone. Measuring distance with distance feels weird. Measuring distance with time feels more natural.

Was in D.C. with friends one time and I said that shop’s about 5-10 minutes away. They were like how far is that? I told 5-10 minutes and they were so confused. I got confused when he told me the distance with mileage and I was like that gives me no context of how far it is.

−1

vodkanipples t1_iwnv5e5 wrote

Who uses exist numbers? Don't we all say things like "take the Atwood ave exist or take a left were Benny's used to be"? Or even "get off onto Rte 2, pass 2 dunkins and it's on the right "?

1

kdex86 t1_iwo27sg wrote

Massachusetts completed all of their exit renumbering in 10 months, from October 2020 to August 2021. Rhode Island, meanwhile, started in 2017 with I-295 and finally completed every highway when they finished I-95 earlier this month.

1

kdex86 t1_iwo2dja wrote

Nope. New Hampshire and Delaware still are 100% sequential exits. Vermont also “cut corners”, adding small “milepoint exit xx” signs on their highways but predominantly displaying the sequential numbers.

3

iandavid t1_iwoeuze wrote

The maddening thing about I-95 in Connecticut is that there are actually 93 exits along the 111 miles between Rhode Island and New York. So they seem like milepost exits, but there’s really just that many of them.

1

lesliehand t1_iwoo23g wrote

Millions and millions of dollars to change the exit numbers along 95 for state after state after state rather than fix potholes

−2

Immaeachoo t1_iwpesym wrote

Love how they need to have the signs saying what the exit # used to be... The one saying OLD 25 made me think of Leonardo DiCaprio

2

kdex86 t1_iwq61tz wrote

CT and NY are dragging their feet. Each state has converted at least 1 Interstate highway to mile-based exits, but most other highways are still sequential.

1

TheDominoEffectEST89 t1_iwqzta7 wrote

I've gotten to Providence from Newport in 35 minutes. I have chronic lead foot syndrome with a perfect driving record. No tickets, nadaaaa. Got to Narragansett from Pawtucket yesterday in about 25. When you get in the fast lane, I looked down at my odometer, at one point on I-95S, I'm 4th of a train of 6 cars all going the same-ish speed. That speed being 96mph by the exits down by Warwick 😅 WE GO VROOM VROOM and we had a Honda Pilot pass allllll of us while he was chitchatting away on his phone. 😅 #RIDrivingPros

2

KennyWuKanYuen t1_iwr0fyf wrote

As long as you use your indicators I’m perfectly happy. XD

It feels like I’m not even moving when I’m going 50-60. 70 seems normal and 90 feels like I’m moving. I don’t know how people manage to drive so slow AND have no situational awareness. Like you see a fast car coming up behind , you’d think “oh let them go merge over”, but nope they’re like “I’m going to brake right when you get close and there’s nothing in front of me to brake for.”

1

monkysandtools t1_iwsafv4 wrote

CT did it half assed on their resignage (a friend is constantly on RT9 and mentioned the conflicting numbering)

As for VT, it seems rather silly along I-89 and I-91 (which are ~130 miles each) when's there only 20 something exits along each highway

0